MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403629249 · doi:10.1098/rsos.231878

Asymmetric autocatalytic reactions and their stationary distribution

2024· article· en· W4403629249 on OpenAlexafffund
Cameron Gallinger, Lea Popovic

Bibliographic record

VenueRoyal Society Open Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrigins and Evolution of Life
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAmerican Institute of Mathematics
KeywordsAutocatalysisStatistical physicsDistribution (mathematics)MathematicsPhysicsClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisKinetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We consider a general class of autocatalytic reactions, which has been shown to display stochastic switching behaviour (discreteness-induced transitions (DITs)) in some parameter regimes. This behaviour was shown to occur either when the overall species count is low or when the rate of inflow and outflow of species is relatively much smaller than the rate of autocatalytic reactions. The long-term behaviour of this class was analysed in Bibbona et al. (Bibbona et al. 2020 J. R. Soc. Interface17, 20200243 (doi:10.1098/rsif.2020.0243)) with an analytic formula for the stationary distribution in the symmetric case. We focus on the case of asymmetric autocatalytic reactions and provide a formula for an approximate stationary distribution of the model. We show this distribution has different properties corresponding to the distinct behaviour of the process in the three parameter regimes; in the DIT regime, the formula provides the fraction of time spent at each of the stable points.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRoyal Society Open ScienceSame topicOrigins and Evolution of LifeFrench-language works237,207