MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403630625 · doi:10.1186/s40360-024-00804-z

In silico molecular targets, docking, dynamics simulation and physiologically based pharmacokinetics modeling of oritavancin

2024· article· en· W4403630625 on OpenAlexaff
Toluwase Hezekiah Fatoki, Tosin Christianah Balogun, Adebayo Emmanuel Ojewuyi, Aduragbemi Christianah Omole, Oluwaseun Victor Olukayode, Afolasade Precious Adewumi, Adanne Joy Umesi, Nwadinma Priscillia Ijeoma, Abibat Esther Apooyin, Chinecherem Perpetual Chinedu, Ibiyemi A. Idowu, Momoh Jimoh Isah

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Pharmacology and Toxicology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn silicoDocking (animal)Computer scienceComputational biologyMolecular dynamicsChemistryBiologyMedicineComputational chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Oritavancin is a semi-synthetic lipoglycopeptide antibiotic primarily used to treat serious infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria. The aim of this study was to elucidate possible molecular targets of oritavancin in human and microbes in relevance to its mechanism of action and model its pharmacokinetics for optimal dose selection in clinical practice. Computational methods were used in this study which include target prediction, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, pharmacokinetics prediction, and physiological-based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) modeling. Oritavancin was moderately soluble in water and did not permeate the blood-brain barrier. Seven molecular targets were identified in humans. Molecular docking results showed highest binding affinity of oritavancin with PI3-kinase p110-gamma subunit (−10.34 kcal/mol), followed by Acyl-CoA desaturase (−10.07 kcal/mol) and Cytochrome P450 2C19 (−8.384 kcal/mol). Oritavancin PBPK modelling in adult human showed that infusion has lower peak concentrations (Cmax) compared to bolus administration, with 1200 mg dose yielded Cmax of 16.559 mg/L, 800 mg dose yielded Cmax of 11.258 mg/L, and 200 mg over 3 days dose yielded Cmax of 7.526 mg/L. Notably, infusion gave extended half-life (t1/2) for all doses and slightly higher clearance rates compared to bolus, particularly for the 1200 mg and 800 mg doses. The results corroborated existing clinical pharmacokinetic data, and confirmed the model’s accuracy and predictive capability. This comprehensive computational study has provided invaluable insights into the pharmacological profile of Oritavancin, aiding its further development and optimization for clinical use.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.661
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Pharmacology and ToxicologySame topicCancer therapeutics and mechanismsFrench-language works237,207