MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403632760 · doi:10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101446

Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism: 2024 guidelines from the French Working Group on Perioperative Haemostasis (GIHP) developed in collaboration with the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR), the French Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SFTH) and the French Society of Vascular Medicine (SFMV) and endorsed by the French Society of Digestive Surgery (SFCD), the French Society of Pharmacology and Therapeutics (SFPT) and INNOVTE (Investigation Network On Venous ThromboEmbolism) network

2024· article· en· W4403632760 on OpenAlexaff
Anne Godiér, Dominique Lasne, Gilles Pernod, Normand Blais, Fanny Bonhomme, Fanny Vardon‐Bounes, Alex Bourguignon, Ariel Cohen, Emmanuel de Maistre, Pierre Fontana, Jean-Philippe Galanaud, D. Garrigue Huet, Alexandre Godon, Isabelle Gouin‐Thibault, Samia Jebara, Silvy Laporte, Thomas Lecompte, Dan Longrois, Jerrold H. Levy, Grégoire Le Gal, Yves Gruel, Alexandre Mansour, Anne‐Céline Martin, Mikaël Mazighi, Pierre‐Emmanuel Morange, Serge Motte, François Mullier, Philippe Nguyên, Nadia Rosencher, Stéphanie Roullet, P.M. Roy, Jean‐François Schved, Marie-Antoinette Sevestre, Piérre Siè, Sophie Susen, Charles Tacquard, André Vincentelli, Paul Zufferey, Patrick Mismetti, Pierre Albaladejo

Bibliographic record

VenueAnaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science CentreWilfrid Laurier UniversityCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePerioperativeVenous thromboembolismPerioperative medicineIntensive care medicineIntensive careAnesthesiaMEDLINESurgeryThrombosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Any surgical procedure carries a risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), albeit variable. Improvements in medical and surgical practices and the shortening of care pathways due to the development of day surgery and enhanced recovery after surgery, have reduced the perioperative risk for VTE. OBJECTIVE: A collaborative working group of experts in perioperative haemostasis updated in 2024 the recommendations for the Prevention of perioperative venous thromboembolism published in 2011. METHODS: The addressed questions were defined by 40 experts (GIHP, SFAR, SFTH and SFMV) and formulated in a PICO format. They performed the literature review and formulated recommendations according to the Grading of GRADE system. Recommendations were then validated by a vote determining the strength of each recommendation. Of note, these recommendations do not cover all surgical specialties. Especially, thromboprophylaxis in cardiac surgery, neurosurgery and obstetrics is not addressed. RESULTS: 78 recommendations were formalized into 17 sections, including patient-related VTE risk factors, types of surgery, extreme body weight, renal impairment, mechanical prophylaxis, distal deep vein thrombosis; 27 were found to have a high level of evidence (GRADE 1) and 41 a low level of evidence (GRADE 2) and 10 were expert opinion. All had strong agreement among the experts. CONCLUSIONS: These guidelines help to weigh the perioperative risk for VTE (which includes the risk associated to surgery and the patient-related risk) against the adverse effects of thromboprophylaxis, either pharmacological or mechanical. This includes particularly the bleeding risk induced by antithrombotic drugs as well as costs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.436
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.014
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnaesthesia Critical Care & Pain MedicineSame topicVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementFrench-language works237,207