MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403633514 · doi:10.1016/j.laa.2024.10.016

Laplacian {−1,0,1}- and {−1,1}-diagonalizable graphs

2024· article· en· W4403633514 on OpenAlexafffund
Nathaniel Johnston, Sarah Plosker

Bibliographic record

VenueLinear Algebra and its Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGraph theory and applications
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityMount Allison University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsDiagonalizable matrixMathematicsCombinatoricsLaplace operatorLaplacian matrixEigenvalues and eigenvectorsDiscrete mathematicsGraphPure mathematicsMathematical analysisSymmetric matrix

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A graph is called Laplacian integral if the eigenvalues of its Laplacian matrix are all integers. We investigate the subset of these graphs whose Laplacian is furthermore diagonalized by a matrix with entries coming from a fixed set, in particular, the sets { − 1 , 0 , 1 } or { − 1 , 1 } . Such graphs include as special cases the recently-investigated families of Hadamard-diagonalizable and weakly Hadamard-diagonalizable graphs. As a combinatorial tool to aid in our investigation, we introduce a family of vectors that we call balanced , which generalizes totally balanced partitions, regular sequences, and complete partitions. We show that balanced vectors completely characterize which graph complements and complete multipartite graphs are { − 1 , 0 , 1 } -diagonalizable, and we furthermore prove results on diagonalizability of the Cartesian product, disjoint union, and join of graphs. Particular attention is paid to the { − 1 , 0 , 1 } - and { − 1 , 1 } -diagonalizability of the complete graphs and complete multipartite graphs. Finally, we provide a complete list of all simple, connected graphs on nine or fewer vertices that are { − 1 , 0 , 1 } - or { − 1 , 1 } -diagonalizable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLinear Algebra and its ApplicationsSame topicGraph theory and applicationsFrench-language works237,207