MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403634972 · doi:10.1016/j.jtct.2024.10.011

Real-World Outcomes of Upfront Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma With Deletion 17p

2024· article· en· W4403634972 on OpenAlexaff
Curtis Marcoux, Oren Pasvolsky, Denái R. Milton, Mark R. Tanner, Qaiser Bashir, Samer A. Srour, Neeraj Saini, Paul Lin, Jeremy Ramdial, Yago Nieto, Guilin Tang, Hans C. Lee, Krina K. Patel, Partow Kebriaei, Amna Ahmed, Yosra Aljawai, Sheeba K. Thomas, Robert Z. Orlowski, Elizabeth J. Shpall, Richard E. Champlin, Muzaffar H. Qazilbash

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation and Cellular Therapy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
FundersNational Cancer InstituteUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterDr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research FoundationLeukemia and Lymphoma Society
KeywordsMultiple myelomaMedicineHematopoietic stem cell transplantationStem cellAutologous stem-cell transplantationTransplantationOncologyInternal medicineBiologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Retrospective study of 115 patients with NDMM with del(17p) undergoing upfront auto-HCT. • Median PFS was 19.9 months and median OS was 71.5 months. • Better PFS associated with MRD-negative CR post-transplant and maintenance therapy. • Dismal outcomes with concurrent del(17p) and t(4;14). Despite tremendous advancements in multiple myeloma (MM) therapeutics, outcomes remain heterogeneous, heavily influenced by clinical and cytogenetic factors. Among these, deletion of the short arm of chromosome 17 (del(17p)) is a strong predictor of poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate real-world outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) with del(17p) undergoing upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with NDMM who underwent upfront auto-HCT at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2008 and 2018. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), with secondary endpoints being hematological response and measurable residual disease (MRD) status postauto-HCT. MRD status in the bone marrow biopsy was evaluated using 8-color next-generation flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 1/10 –5 cells. One hundred and fifteen patients were included (55% male). Median age at auto-HCT was 62 years (range 34 to 83). The median del(17p) clone size was 20%, with 51 (53%) patients having clone sizes >20% and 15 (15%) patients having clone sizes >55%. Additional high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities included t(4;14) in 15 (13%) patients, t(14;16) in 8 (7%) patients, and 1q21+ in 25 (22%) patients. After induction, 10% of patients achieved ≥ CR, and 50% achieved ≥ VGPR, with 25% having MRD-negative ≥ VGPR. Post-transplant, 42% achieved ≥ CR, and 83% achieved ≥ VGPR as best response, with 55% (48/87) having MRD-negative ≥ VGPR. With a median follow-up of 31.4 months (range 3.1 to 199.1), median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 19.9 and 71.5 months, respectively, and 5-year OS was 53%. Concurrent del(17p) and t(4;14) were associated with significantly worse outcomes, with median PFS and OS of 11.5 and 22.4 months, respectively. In multivariable analysis (MVA), female sex was associated with worse PFS (HR [95% CI] 2.87 [1.75 to 4.72], P < .001), while MRD negative CR post-transplant (0.35 [0.18 to 0.68], P = .002) and maintenance therapy (0.46 [0.27 to 0.77], P = 0.003) were associated with better PFS. In MVA for OS, female sex (2.22 [1.18 to 4.17], P = 0.013) and the presence of t(4;14) (2.55 [1.09 to 5.95], P = 0.030) were associated with worse OS, whereas Karnofsky Performance Status of ≥90 (0.47 [0.23 to 0.94], P = 0.034) was associated with better OS. This study affirms del(17p) as a high-risk abnormality with unfavorable outcomes despite modern therapies. The co-occurrence of del(17p) and t(4;14) was associated with particularly poor outcomes. Novel approaches are needed for this high-risk subgroup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantation and Cellular TherapySame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207