MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403639509 · doi:10.1136/lupus-2024-001282

Improving routine mental health screening for depression and anxiety in a paediatric lupus clinic: a quality improvement initiative for enhanced mental healthcare

2024· article· en· W4403639509 on OpenAlexaff
Tala El Tal, Audrea Chen, Stephanie J. Wong, Asha Jeyanathan, Avery Longmore, Holly Convery, Dinah Finkelstein, Linda T. Hiraki, Chetana Kulkarni, Neely Lerman, Karen Leslie, Deborah M. Levy, Sharon Lorber, Oscar Mwizerwa, Lawrence Ng, Vandana Rawal, Evelyn Smith, Alène Toulany, Andrea Knight

Bibliographic record

VenueLupus Science & Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnxietyReferralMental healthPsychological interventionDepression (economics)Patient Health QuestionnairePatient satisfactionPsychiatryFamily medicineDepressive symptomsNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Mental health (MH) conditions are prevalent in adolescents with childhood-onset SLE (cSLE). Early identification is crucial in preventing poor patient outcomes; however, MH screening rates remain low. LOCAL PROBLEM: From July 2021-January 2022, only 15% of adolescents in a paediatric tertiary care cSLE clinic were being screened for depression and anxiety. By November 2023, we aimed to increase the percentage of patients with cSLE (≥12-18 years) screened for depression (Patient Health Questionnaire: PHQ-9) and anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7: GAD-7) from 15% to 80%. METHODS: This quality improvement project employed the Model for Improvement framework. Stakeholders included the clinic team, patients and families, and MH providers. Statistical process control charts were used to analyse the outcome measure for percentage of screened patients with cSLE. Patient and caregiver satisfaction surveys were conducted at baseline and after screening as a balancing measure. INTERVENTIONS: MH screening workflow with a referral algorithm was developed with stakeholders. Additional interventions included two MH training workshops for healthcare providers and a preclinic reminder of eligible patients for screening. RESULTS: Over 21 months, 146 patients with cSLE completed 270 MH screens, increasing the screening rate from 15%, peaking at 100%, to a median of 56%. Sixty-six individuals (45%) reported symptoms of depression and/or anxiety on their initial screen. Of 270 screens, 44 individuals (17%) reported moderate to severe symptoms meeting the screening workflow criteria for referral to a MH service; 10% of patients screened were referred and seen by the MH service within 2-12 weeks. Patients and caregivers reported satisfaction with the MH screening process and quality of MH follow-up. CONCLUSION: Despite not sustainably meeting the target, MH screening rates increased in the cSLE clinic by nearly fourfold, demonstrating feasibility and acceptability. Patients expressed satisfaction with their mental health follow-up, emphasising its importance in their care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLupus Science & MedicineSame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207