Resilience of Loin Meat Microbiota and of Resistance Genes to a Chlortetracycline Treatment in Weaned Piglets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This project studied the impact of a chlortetracycline treatment in weaning piglets on the taxonomy and antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) content of the microbiomes on carcasses and loins. METHODS: Two groups of piglets from two farrowing barns with either an average or a lower sanitary health status were used. Each group was divided in half: a control group and a treatment group receiving feed supplemented with 660 g of chlortetracycline per tonne for 21 days. The piglets then went through fattening and were sent to the abattoir when they reached the targeted slaughter weight. RESULTS: The microbiomes of the pig carcasses and loins were sampled, and DNA was extracted and sequenced with a whole-genome approach. The microbiomes of the carcasses differed depending on the farrowing barn source in both taxonomical composition and ARG content; however, the microbiomes on the loins were similar, regardless of the farrowing barn source and the treatment group. CONCLUSIONS: While there were differences in the carcass microbiomes between treatments after processing by the abattoir, the loin microbiomes were consistent and unaffected by treatment with chlortetracycline or the sanitary status of the farrowing barn.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".