An Isoflavone Synthase Gene in Arachis hypogea Responds to Phoma arachidicola Infection Causing Web Blotch
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peanut web blotch is an important leaf disease caused by Phoma arachidicola, which seriously affects the quality and yield of peanuts. However, the molecular mechanisms of peanut resistance to peanut web blotch are not well understood. In this study, a transcriptome analysis of the interaction between peanut (Arachis hypogaea) and P. arachidicola revealed that total 2989 (779 up- and 2210 down-regulated) genes were all differentially expressed in peanut leaves infected by P. arachidicola at 7, 14, 21 days post inoculation. The pathways that were strongly differentially expressed were the flavone or isoflavone biosynthesis pathways. In addition, two 2-hydroxy isoflavanone synthase genes, IFS1 and IFS2, were strongly induced by P. arachidicola infection. Overexpression of the two genes enhanced resistance to Phytophthora parasitica in Nicotiana benthamiana. Knockout of AhIFS genes in peanut reduced disease resistance to P. arachidicola. These findings demonstrated that AhIFS genes play key roles in peanut resistance to P. arachidicola infection. Promoter analysis of the two AhIFS genes showed several defense-related cis-elements distributed in the promoter region. This study improves our understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind resistance of peanut infection by P. arachidicola, and provides important information that could be used to undertake greater detailed characterization of web blotch resistance genes in peanut.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".