Multi-stage semi-supervised learning enhances white matter hyperintensity segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction White matter hyperintensities (WMHs) are frequently observed on magnetic resonance (MR) images in older adults, commonly appearing as areas of high signal intensity on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MR scans. Elevated WMH volumes are associated with a greater risk of dementia and stroke, even after accounting for vascular risk factors. Manual segmentation, while considered the ground truth, is both labor-intensive and time-consuming, limiting the generation of annotated WMH datasets. Un-annotated data are relatively available; however, the requirement of annotated data poses a challenge for developing supervised machine learning models. Methods To address this challenge, we implemented a multi-stage semi-supervised learning (M3SL) approach that first uses un-annotated data segmented by traditional processing methods (“bronze” and “silver” quality data) and then uses a smaller number of “gold”-standard annotations for model refinement. The M3SL approach enabled fine-tuning of the model weights with the gold-standard annotations. This approach was integrated into the training of a U-Net model for WMH segmentation. We used data from three scanner vendors (over more than five scanners) and from both cognitively normal (CN) adult and patients cohorts [with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease (AD)]. Results An analysis of WMH segmentation performance across both scanner and clinical stage (CN, MCI, AD) factors was conducted. We compared our results to both conventional and transfer-learning deep learning methods and observed better generalization with M3SL across different datasets. We evaluated several metrics ( F -measure, IoU , and Hausdorff distance) and found significant improvements with our method compared to conventional ( p < 0.001) and transfer-learning ( p < 0.001). Discussion These findings suggest that automated, non-machine learning, tools have a role in a multi-stage learning framework and can reduce the impact of limited annotated data and, thus, enhance model performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".