MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403671945 · doi:10.29173/jaed38

Mi’kmaw-Owned Partnership in Clearwater Seafoods

2024· article· en· W4403671945 on OpenAlexaff
Mary Beth Doucette, Ryan Stack

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aboriginal Economic Development · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicIdentification and Quantification in Food
Canadian institutionsAcadia UniversityCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipBusinessFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The keynote presentation at the 2023 Cando Annual Conference focused on telling the story of the acquisition of Clearwater Seafoods by the Mi'kmaw Consortium and Premium Brand Seafoods. It highlighted a Mi’kmaw corporate perspective of the acquisition, co-presented Mike McIntyre, Membertou CFO, Jenny Morgan, Clearwater Seafoods LP, Darryl McDonald, CAO Paqtnkek Mi'kmaw Nation. This lesson from experience submission is a summary of their presentation which focused on three core aspects of the deal. First was the messaging around building business relationships. The endeavor was only possible because Membertou had a reputation for being community minded, trustworthy, and professional. Second, the deal was crafted to minimize risk to pre-existing community assets the deal would not hurt the borrowing potential of the coalition communities in the near or distant future. Finally, the presentation highlighted the opportunities for Clearwater to expand through strategic innovation. Although Premium Brands was not represented in the presentation, the explanation of their role in the partnership highlights the potential for strategic innovation in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.994
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0000.007
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aboriginal Economic DevelopmentSame topicIdentification and Quantification in FoodFrench-language works237,207