MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403673819 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451049

The CHEOPS view of the climate of WASP-3 b

2024· article· en· W4403673819 on OpenAlexfundno aff
G. Scandariato, L. Carone, Patricio E. Cubillos, P. F. L. Maxted, T. Zingales, M.N. Günther, A. Heitzmann, M. Lendl, T. G. Wilson, A. Bonfanti, G. Bruno, A. Krenn, E. A. Meier Valdés, V. Singh, M I Swayne, Y. Alibert, R. Alonso, T. Bárczy, D. Barrado, S. C. C. Barros, W. Baumjohann, W. Benz, N. Billot, L. Borsato, A. Brandeker, C. Broeg, M. Buder, M.-D. Busch, A. Collier Cameron, A. C. M. Correia, Sz. Csizmadia, M. B. Davies, M. Deleuil, A. Deline, L. Delrez, O. D. S. Demangeon, Brice-Olivier Demory, A. Derekas, B. Edwards, D. Ehrenreich, A. Erikson, Jacopo Farinato, A. Fortier, L. Fossati, M. Fridlund, D. Gandolfi, K. Gazeas, M. Gillon, M. Güdel, Ch. Helling, K. G. Isaak, L. L. Kiss, J. Korth, K. W. F. Lam, J. Laskar, A. Lecavelier des Etangs, Demetrio Magrin, B. Merín, C. Mordasini, V. Nascimbeni, G. Olofsson, R. Ottensamer, I. Pagano, Ε. Πάλλη, G. Peter, D. Piazza, G. Piotto, D. Pollacco, D. Queloz, Roberto Ragazzoni, N. Rando, H. Rauer, I. Ribas, N.C. Santos, D. Ségransan, A. E. Simon, A. M. S. Smith, S. G. Sousa, M. Stalport, S. Sulis, M. Gy. Szabó, S. Udry, V. Van Grootel, J. Venturini, E. Villaver, N. A. Walton

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Regional Development FundStaatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und InnovationScience and Technology Facilities CouncilHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaCentre National d’Etudes SpatialesFondazione CRTEuropean CommissionMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónNvidiaGeneralitat de CatalunyaUK Space AgencyAustrian Science FundSwedish National Space AgencyNational Research, Development and Innovation OfficeAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungCanadian Celiac AssociationAgence Nationale de la RechercheSimons FoundationUniversité de LiègeUniversity of WarwickDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftDipartimenti di EccellenzaNational Science FoundationBelgian Federal Science Policy OfficeCentres de Recerca de CatalunyaEuropean Space AgencyFonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRSMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsAstrobiologyAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context . Hot Jupiters are giant planets subject to intense stellar radiation. The physical and chemical properties of their atmosphere make them the most amenable targets for atmospheric characterization. Aims . In this paper we analyze the photometry collected during the secondary eclipses of the hot Jupiter WASP-3 b by CHEOPS, TESS, and Spitzer . Our aim is to characterize the atmosphere of the planet by measuring the secondary eclipse depth in several passbands and constrain the planetary dayside spectrum. Methods . We updated the radius and the ephemeris of WASP-3 b by analyzing the transit photometry collected by CHEOPS and TESS. We also analyzed the CHEOPS, TESS, and Spitzer photometry of the occultations of the planet, measuring the eclipse depth at different wavelengths. Results . Our update of the stellar and planetary properties is consistent with previous works. The analysis of the occultations returns an eclipse depth of 92±21 ppm in the CHEOPS passband, 83±27 ppm for TESS, and >2000 ppm in the IRAC 1-2-4 Spitzer passbands. Using the eclipse depths in the Spitzer bands, we propose a set of likely emission spectra that constrain the emission contribution in the CHEOPS and TESS passbands to approximately a few dozen parts per million. This allowed us to measure a geometric albedo of 0.21±0.07 in the CHEOPS passband, while the TESS data lead to a 95% upper limit of ∼0.2. Conclusions . WASP-3 b belongs to the group of ultra-hot Jupiters that are characterized by a low Bond albedo (<0.3±0.1), as predicted by different atmospheric models. On the other hand, it seems to efficiently recirculate the absorbed stellar energy, which is not typical for similar, highly irradiated planets. To explain this inconsistency, we propose that other energy recirculation mechanisms are at play besides advection (for example, the dissociation and recombination of H 2 ). Another possibility is that the observations in different bandpasses probe different atmospheric layers; this would make the atmospheric analysis difficult without an appropriate modeling of the thermal emission spectrum of WASP-3 b, which is not feasible with the limited spectroscopic data available to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207