MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403674059 · doi:10.1177/01455613241292734

Investigation of Body Perception, Alexithymic Characteristics, and Self-Esteem in Patients Underwent Septorhinoplasty

2024· article· en· W4403674059 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tarik Yağci, Zehra Günay Yağci

Bibliographic record

VenueEar Nose & Throat Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineToronto Alexithymia ScaleTemperamentAlexithymiaOtorhinolaryngologyRhinoplastyClinical psychologyPersonalityNosePsychiatrySurgeryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: This study evaluated patients’ body perception, self-esteem, and personality traits during the preoperative and postoperative periods of septorhinoplasty. Based on these evaluations, we may provide patient selection recommendations for septorhinoplasty applicants. Methods: In this cross-sectional questionnaire study, 86 patients who underwent primary septorhinoplasty in the Department of Otolaryngology at Bilecik Training and Research Hospital were included between March 2023 and 2024. The same surgeon performed all operations. The preoperative Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) Questionnaire, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES), Body Perception Scale (BPS), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS), and TEMPS-A Temperament Scale in the preoperative period and ROE, RSES, and BPS in the postoperative period were applied. Results: Fifty-four female and 32 male patients participated in our study. The mean age was 24.0 ± 0.6 years. While there was no significant difference in the BPS and RSES scores between the preoperative and postoperative periods, the total ROE score was significantly higher in the postoperative than in the preoperative period. Postoperative ROE scores were positively correlated with RSES and hyperthymic temperament. In contrast, it was negatively correlated with depressive temperament, cyclothymic temperament, anxious temperament, BPS total score, TAS total score, and TAS emotion recognition and expression subscale scores. In the group with alexithymia features separated according to the TAS cutoff score, preoperative and postoperative ROE results were significantly lower, whereas depressive, cyclothymic, irritable, and anxious personality traits and total BPS scores were higher. However, the postoperative RSBE scores were lower in this group. Conclusion: This is the first study to evaluate self-esteem, body image, alexithymia, and personality traits in septorhinoplasty patients. Appropriate patient selection is essential for success and patient satisfaction in aesthetic operations such as septorhinoplasty. Performing BPS, TEMPS-A, and TAS may help evaluate psychological factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEar Nose & Throat JournalSame topicBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesFrench-language works237,207