MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403679634 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxae067.037

38 Disparities in health outcomes by the age of five among preterm children in rural versus urban communities in British Columbia

2024· article· en· W4403679634 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lindsay L. Richter, Ye Shen, Sarka Lisonkova, Joseph Ting

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental healthDemographyGeographyHealth equityMedicineGerontologySocioeconomicsPublic healthSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Health disparities exist between than urban and rural communities, as rates of preterm birth, severe maternal morbidity and severe neonatal morbidity are higher in rural areas. There are limited population-based studies on early childhood health outcomes among those born preterm by geographical area. Objectives To compare health service use, morbidity, and medication use for up to five years of age between preterm children in rural versus urban residences. Design/Methods The study included liveborn infants at 22-44 weeks’ gestational age (GA) in British Columbia (BC), Canada, 2004-2014. Follow-up data to December 2019 included linked health information from four provincial databases (perinatal database, outpatient visits, hospitalizations, and outpatient prescriptions). Urban-rural status was based on maternal residence at birth. Rate ratios (RR) of health service use, childhood morbidity and medication use were compared within GA categories (22-27, 28-33, 34-36, 37-44) by rural vs. urban region using Poisson regression. Results There were 49,555 (10.9%) rural and 406,149 (89.1%) urban children included in this study. 42,789 children were born at <37 weeks GA, and the preterm birth rate was 9.4%. Compared to urban areas, children in rural regions had more hospitalizations (28-33 weeks: RR 1.35, 95% CI: 1.19-1.51; 34-36 weeks: RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.27-1.44; 37-44 weeks: RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.29-1.34) by five years of age; and significantly fewer outpatient visits (22-27 weeks: RR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.87-0.93; 28-33 weeks: RR 0.81, 95% CI: 0.80-0.82; 34-36 weeks: RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.74-0.75; 37-44 weeks: RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.71-0.71). Rural children born at 34-36 weeks had significantly higher rates of bronchiolitis (RR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.16-1.56) compared to urban children. They were prescribed more antibiotics and bronchodilators (RR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.13-1.17, and RR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.19, respectively). Conclusion Compared with urban areas, preterm children living in rural regions of BC had higher rates of hospitalization, higher rates of bronchiolitis and more frequent prescriptions of antibiotics and bronchodilators by five years of age. These disparities in health status and service use warrant further research and public health interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207