iSubGen generates integrative disease subtypes by pairwise similarity assessment
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are myriad types of biomedical data-molecular, clinical images, and others. When a group of patients with the same underlying disease exhibits similarities across multiple types of data, this is called a subtype. Existing subtyping approaches struggle to handle diverse data types with missing information. To improve subtype discovery, we exploited changes in the correlation-structure between different data types to create iSubGen, an algorithm for integrative subtype generation. iSubGen can accommodate any feature that can be compared with a similarity metric to create subtypes versatilely. It can combine arbitrary data types for subtype discovery, such as merging genetic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and pathway data. iSubGen recapitulates known subtypes across multiple cancers even with substantial missing data and identifies subtypes with distinct clinical behaviors. It performs equally with or superior to other subtyping methods, offering greater stability and robustness to missing data and flexibility to new data types. It is available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/iSubGen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it