MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403682970 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxae067.064

65 Neonatal ventilator-associated pneumonia: A tale of three cities in Canada West

2024· article· en· W4403682970 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexandra Kowalczyk, Celine Balay, Adel Elsharkawy, Claire Hamilton, Julie McKanna, Mimi Kuan, Jonathan Wong, Joseph Ting

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNosocomial Infections in ICU
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPneumoniaVentilator-associated pneumoniaMedicineIntensive care medicinePediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Preterm infants are at increased risk for acquired infections related to invasive devices such as endotracheal tubes (ETT). Wide heterogeneity exists in diagnostic criteria and management of ventilator-associated pneumonias (VAP), which have not been validated in the neonatal population. Objectives To determine the demographic characteristics and prevalence of VAP according to three different existing criteria used in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Design/Methods In this retrospective study, we included infants born at <33 weeks gestational age from 3 different NICUs in western Canada, who have been diagnosed with VAP during 2018 – 2022. Infants were diagnosed per three diagnostic criteria: (1) Diagnosed per physician diagnoses (mechanically ventilated infants with stability or improvement ≥48 hours and deterioration at the physician’s discretion); (2) VAP diagnostic consensus adopted by some Canadian NICUs (Canadian criteria) (including escalation in respiratory support such as increase in FiO2 by minimum 0.25, increase in MAP by minimum 4 or change in ventilation mode); and (3) Criteria of a paediatric ventilator-associated condition (PVAC) with a positive respiratory diagnostic test (PVAC criteria) (including escalation in respiratory support such as increase in FiO2 by minimum 0.1, increase in MAP by minimum 2 or change in ventilation mode). Results There were 185 neonates diagnosed to have VAP at physicians’ discretion during the study period, with incidences of 4.6%, 8.9%, and 5.7% in the three NICUs. They had a median GA of 25 weeks, a median birth weight of 748-849 grams, and a median onset of VAP ranging from 16-31 days. Among the VAP per physicians’ diagnoses, 18.2-55.0% of infants fulfilled the VAP criteria of Canadian consensus, and 10.9-12.5% of them fulfilled the PVAC criteria with a positive respiratory diagnostic test. The demographic distribution showed similar patterns across the three criteria. Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter cloacae complex, Klebsiella species, and oral flora were found to be the most common organisms yielded from ETT aspirate cultures. Conclusion We found that 4.6-8.9% of infants born at <33 weeks GA had VAP diagnosed during their NICU stay. Only around one-ninth of infants fulfilled the PVAC criteria with a positive respiratory diagnostic test. Therefore, there is an urgency to develop neonatal-specific and validated diagnostic criteria for VAP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.213

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.008
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child Health→Same topicNosocomial Infections in ICU→French-language works237,207→