83 What is social paediatrics and how do we teach it? A scoping review of social medicine curricula in the child and youth health context across health disciplines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Social paediatrics is a field that focuses on addressing social and environmental factors that affect children’s health and wellbeing1. Over recent years in medical education, social paediatrics has become increasingly recognized as foundational to undergraduate and postgraduate paediatrics curricula. Paediatric residency programs worldwide have been developing and offering social paediatrics curricula, yet we lack understanding of effective strategies for teaching it to medical trainees. 1. Spencer N, Colomer C, Alperstein G, et al. Social paediatrics. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(2):106-108. doi:10.1136/jech.2003.017681 Objectives We conducted a scoping review to describe the various educational interventions used to teach content and practice related to social paediatrics. Design/Methods We conducted a scoping review to describe the various educational interventions used to teach content and practice related to social paediatrics. Our literature search first drew upon Ovid MEDLINE and MedEd PORTAL, with subsequent studies identified through reference searching in relevant articles. We included studies that described and/or evaluated educational interventions aimed to teach elements of social paediatrics. We excluded studies published before 2000. We extracted data from the selected articles and conducted thematic analysis. Results Our search yielded 443 articles. Initial screen by title and/or abstract and subsequent screen by abstract and/or full text yielded 28 papers. Where it was unclear if studies met inclusion criteria, two additional researchers reviewed the full text. With the addition of articles found in references of the provisional articles, a total of 36 papers were included in the review. Of those, 17 (47%) described curricular interventions at the level of paediatric residency, 7 (19%) described medical school curricula, and 8 (22%) included non-medicine fields such as dentistry, nursing, research, and others. Fifty percent of curricula required self-directed learning, while a different 50% subset had a formal reflection process as part of learning consolidation. We organized the literature thematically into the following themes: interdisciplinary collaboration, community partnership, advocacy training, and experiential learning. Conclusion Our scoping review describes a variety of curricular interventions aimed to teach elements of social paediatrics, with a large focus on social determinants of health, primarily poverty, and a relative lack of focus on the underlying structural, systemic, and social justice issues underpinning these health determinants. We need to consider how the pedagogical strategies on offer can be purposed towards the development of more robust social paediatrics curricula at the postgraduate level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.031 | 0.092 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.032 | 0.028 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".