MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403684043 · doi:10.1103/physrevx.14.041021

Electronic Band Structure of a Superconducting Nickelate Probed by the Seebeck Coefficient in the Disordered Limit

2024· article· en· W4403684043 on OpenAlexaff
G. Grissonnanche, Grace A. Pan, Harrison LaBollita, D. Ferenc Segedin, Qi Song, Hanjong Paik, Charles M. Brooks, E. Beauchesne-Blanchet, J.L. González, Antía S. Botana, Julia A. Mundy, B. J. Ramshaw

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review X · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
FundersDivision of Materials Sciences and EngineeringEnergy Frontier Research CentersBasic Energy SciencesGordon and Betty Moore FoundationU.S. Department of EnergyDavid and Lucile Packard FoundationOffice of ScienceAgence Nationale de la RechercheNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSuperconductivitySeebeck coefficientCupratePhysicsCondensed matter physicsMaterials scienceThermoelectric effectQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Superconducting nickelates are a new family of strongly correlated electron materials with a phase diagram closely resembling that of superconducting cuprates. While analogy with the cuprates is natural, very little is known about the metallic state of the nickelates, making these comparisons difficult. We probe the electronic dispersion of thin-film superconducting five-layer ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mi>n</a:mi> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>5</a:mn> </a:math> ) and metallic three-layer ( <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:mi>n</c:mi> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:mn>3</c:mn> </c:math> ) nickelates by measuring the Seebeck coefficient <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <e:mi>S</e:mi> </e:math> . We find a temperature-independent and negative <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <g:mi>S</g:mi> <g:mo>/</g:mo> <g:mi>T</g:mi> </g:math> for both <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:mi>n</i:mi> <i:mo>=</i:mo> <i:mn>5</i:mn> </i:math> and <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:mi>n</k:mi> <k:mo>=</k:mo> <k:mn>3</k:mn> </k:math> nickelates. These results are in stark contrast to the strongly temperature-dependent <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <m:mi>S</m:mi> <m:mo>/</m:mo> <m:mi>T</m:mi> </m:math> measured at similar electron filling in the cuprate <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <o:mrow> <o:msub> <o:mrow> <o:mi>La</o:mi> </o:mrow> <o:mrow> <o:mn>1.36</o:mn> </o:mrow> </o:msub> </o:mrow> <o:mrow> <o:msub> <o:mrow> <o:mi>Nd</o:mi> </o:mrow> <o:mrow> <o:mn>0.4</o:mn> </o:mrow> </o:msub> </o:mrow> <o:mrow> <o:msub> <o:mrow> <o:mi>Sr</o:mi> </o:mrow> <o:mrow> <o:mn>0.24</o:mn> </o:mrow> </o:msub> </o:mrow> <o:mrow> <o:msub> <o:mrow> <o:mi>CuO</o:mi> </o:mrow> <o:mrow> <o:mn>4</o:mn> </o:mrow> </o:msub> </o:mrow> </o:math> . The electronic structure calculated from density-functional theory can reproduce the temperature dependence, sign, and amplitude of <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <q:mi>S</q:mi> <q:mo>/</q:mo> <q:mi>T</q:mi> </q:math> in the nickelates using Boltzmann transport theory. This demonstrates that the electronic structure obtained from first-principles calculations provides a reliable description of the fermiology of superconducting nickelates and suggests that, despite indications of strong electronic correlations, there are well-defined quasiparticles in the metallic state. Finally, we explain the differences in the Seebeck coefficient between nickelates and cuprates as originating in strong dissimilarities in impurity concentrations. Our study demonstrates that the high elastic scattering limit of the Seebeck coefficient reflects only the underlying band structure of a metal, analogous to the high magnetic field limit of the Hall coefficient. This opens a new avenue for Seebeck measurements to probe the electronic band structures of relatively disordered quantum materials. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.188
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review XSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207