Actualization of the Problematics of the Other in the Value-Semantic Context Based on Materials from Russian Culture of the Late XVIII – First Quarter of the XIX Centuries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The scientific interest in the problematic of the ‘Other’ remains relevant, particularly in light of ongoing globalization processes. Modern cultures confront, alienate or adopt the values of those with whom they communicate. Questions concerning whether to accept the ‘Other’ and their experiences, the potential for their transformation, and the necessity of openness towards the ‘Other’ constitute a significant modern agenda in intercultural communication. This article presents an effort to synthesize models of reception of the ‘Other’ as articulated by both domestic and European thinkers, including the author’s original scheme of the value-semantic system “Self – Other”. The concept of the ‘Other’ is examined through phenomenological and civilizational approaches. The author notes a spectrum of characteristics attributed to the ‘Other’ and proposes a value-semantic lens for their consideration. A central question that persists to the present day is the possibility of understanding the ‘Other’ or Alien. An analysis of this issue through a value-based optic has revealed the factors of identification and consolidation of the ‘Self’ in relation to the ‘Other’. The author explores this problematic through culturally-historical examples of Russian-French interactions in the late XVIII – first quarter of the XIX centuries. The given examples and cultural and historical experience can be used in the analysis of the current cultural situation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it