Deformability of filament-wound GFRP tubes filled with lightweight aggregate concrete: Experimental and improved analytical studies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous research indicates that lightweight aggregate (LWA) concrete exhibits more brittle failure under compression than conventional normal density (ND) concrete. In contrast, angle-ply fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) filament-wound tubes filled with ND concrete show significant improvements in strength and deformability compared to hollow tubes. This study evaluates the impact of these tubes on LWA concrete to mitigate its brittle behavior. Sixteen concrete-filled FRP filament-wound tubes (CFFTs) made of ±55° filament-wound glass FRP (GFRP) were tested under axial compression. The GFRP tube’s mechanical properties and fiber winding angle of ±55° allowed for a compressive strength enhancement factor ranging from two to five for the CFFTs compared to unconfined specimens. Results also revealed substantial nonlinearity and deformability in the LWA-CFFTs due to the angle-ply tube orientation. An iterative analytical model predicted the CFFT’s nonlinear response, validated by experimental data. The findings demonstrate that angle-ply FRP tubes effectively enhance the bearing capacity and deformability of inherently brittle unconfined LWA concrete.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".