MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403695643 · doi:10.1016/j.wear.2024.205608

Effect of electrical current on sliding friction and wear mechanisms in a-C and ta-C amorphous Carbon coatings

2024· article· en· W4403695643 on OpenAlexafffund
Amir Masoud Khodadadi Behtash, A.T. Alpas

Bibliographic record

VenueWear · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceCurrent (fluid)Amorphous solidCarbon fibersAmorphous carbonMetallurgyComposite materialEngineering physicsCrystallographyElectrical engineeringComposite numberEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigated the sliding wear behaviour of amorphous carbon (a-C) and tetrahedral amorphous carbon (ta-C) coatings, two forms of diamond-like carbon (DLC) coatings, against SAE 52100 steel using a modified ball-on-disk tribometer with applied electrical currents ranging from 100 mA to 1800 mA. It focused on the variations in sliding friction and wear characteristics of these coatings as electrical currents increased under constant load and speed conditions. The a-C coatings exhibited lower coefficient of friction (COF) values and reduced volumetric wear losses up to 1500 mA, while ta-C coatings studied displayed higher wear, similar to uncoated M2 steel, at 300 mA with degradation occurring at low currents, resulting in failure due to severe oxidational wear. The a-C coatings showed no significant electrical damage at these currents. Raman spectroscopy revealed structural changes on the wear tracks of sp 2 -rich a-C coatings, specifically the formation of graphene layers. In comparison, the wear tracks of sp 3 -rich ta-C coatings did not display such transformation under the conditions studied. The graphene coverage on the surfaces of the a-C coatings increased with the increase in the current as revealed by the Raman intensity maps of 2D peaks and this increase was accompanied by a higher defect density in the graphene. The low COF of graphene-covered a-C surfaces was consistent with the proposed mechanisms of moisture adsorption. However, at currents exceeding 900 mA, surface temperatures of a-C coatings exceeded 100 °C, impairing graphene's ability to maintain low friction, resulting in an increased COF. • At 300 mA, M2 steel shows micro pits and a 40x increase in wear loss. • Ta-C coatings develop micro pitting and oxide at 100 mA; fail by 300 mA. • a-C coatings withstand up to 1500 mA with minimal damage due to graphene layers. • Increased currents boost graphene coverage, enhancing friction reduction on a-C. • Above 900 mA, high temperatures reduce the friction benefits of graphene on a-C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWearSame topicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207