MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403707232 · doi:10.1016/j.bneo.2024.100050

Enitociclib, a selective CDK9 inhibitor: in vitro and in vivo preclinical studies in multiple myeloma

2024· article· en· W4403707232 on OpenAlexafffund
Son Tran, Patrick Sipila, Melanie M. Frigault, Beatrix Stelte‐Ludwig, Amy J. Johnson, Joseph Birkett, Raquel Izumi, Ahmed Hamdy, Ranjan Maity, Nizar J. Bahlis, Paola Neri, Aru Narendran

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Neoplasia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsMultiple myelomaIn vivoIn vitroPharmacologyMedicineChemistryBiologyInternal medicineBiochemistryBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Targeting cyclin-dependent kinase 9 with enitociclib induces apoptotic cell death in MM and demonstrates synergy in drug combinations. • Enitociclib may be an effective treatment for MM as a single agent or in combination therapies in future clinical studies. Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancer of plasma cells that remains incurable despite advances in treatment options. In this study, a library of 216 clinically feasible small-molecule inhibitors was screened to identify agents that selectively inhibit MM cell proliferation. Enitociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 9–specific small-molecule inhibitor, was found to be highly effective in decreasing cell viability and inducing apoptosis in 4 MM cell lines. Enitociclib inhibited the phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal domain (CTD) of RNA polymerase II at Ser2/Ser5 and repressed the protein expression of oncogenes c-Myc, myeloid cell leukemia-1 (Mcl-1), and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in MM cells. Additionally, enitociclib demonstrated synergistic effects with several anti-MM agents, including bortezomib, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, and venetoclax. These results suggest that enitociclib may represent a promising therapeutic option for the treatment of MM, either as a single agent or in combination with other anti-MM agents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.818

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood NeoplasiaSame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207