Strengthening by {110} and {112} edge dislocations in BCC high entropy alloys
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Mechanical tests and microscopy studies on body-centered cubic (BCC) high entropy alloys reveal transitions from screw to edge dislocation slip and from {110} to {112} slip plane activity. Here, a strengthening theory for BCC edge dislocation slip on {112} planes is thus developed that parallels a recent theory for {110} slip. Using the atomistic dislocation pressure fields for four BCC elements (Nb, Ta, Mo, W) as proxies to span the range of likely alloy cores, theory predicts that the zero temperature yield strength for {112} slip is slightly lower (0%–20%) than that for {110} slip but that the associated energy barrier is slightly (0%–20%) higher. This leads to cancelling effects, and hence very similar strengths, at finite temperatures and strain rates. Full atomistic results on selected dilute binary alloys show some shifts in these trends, but with similar magnitudes and cancelling effects. The close strengths of {110} and {112} slip modes indicate that subtle aspects beyond the scope of the theory will determine which slip system controls the observed strengthening. This closeness in strength cements the use of the {110} edge theory for guiding alloy design independent of actual slip system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".