MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403722182 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2024.3486120

Dispersion-Induced Delay Deviation and Its Influence on Distributed Strain Measurement Using OFDR

2024· article· en· W4403722182 on OpenAlexaff
Tuo Lv, Dayong Shu, Yang Zhang, Da-Peng Zhou, Wei Peng, Liang Chen, Xiaoyi Bao

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
KeywordsDispersion (optics)Materials scienceStrain (injury)OpticsPolarization mode dispersionPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The broad wavelength tuning range in optical frequency-domain reflectometry (OFDR) enables high-spatial-resolution distributed strain sensing. The large wavelength tuning range of over tens of nanometers makes the issue of dispersion non-negligible; however, the influences of dispersion on the sensing performance in OFDR are seldom discussed in the literature. For high performance measurement, it is necessary to compensate strain induced delay to maintain high coherence between the reference measurement and the sensing measurement. In this work, we find out that the presence of group velocity dispersion introduces significant deviations in determining the delay in a distributed manner. The larger the applied strain is, the greater the induced delay deviation becomes. We also investigate the influences of the delay deviation on distributed strain demodulation based on conventional cross-correlation calculation, showing that high-spatial-resolution distributed strain measurement requires dispersion compensation which allows the delay to be accurately determined and compensated along the sensing fiber. The conclusion in this work indicate that for applications requiring specialty fibers or waveguides, or for scenarios demanding ultrahigh spatial resolution, dispersion influence should not be ignored and it needs to be compensated to enhance the performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Lightwave TechnologySame topicUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave PropagationFrench-language works237,207