MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S1447 Histologic and Combined Histologic and Endoscopic Outcomes After Guselkumab Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: Week 44 Results From the Phase 3 QUASAR Maintenance Study

2024· article· en· W4403722795 on OpenAlexaff
Julián Panés, Axel Dignaß, Tadakazu Hisamatsu, Shadi Yarandi, Kuan‐Hsiang Gary Huang, Matthew Germinaro, Sunandini Sridhar, Patrick Branigan, Rebbecca Wilson, Hongyan Zhang, Fernando Magro, Vipul Jairath, Brian G. Feagan, Gary R. Lichtenstein, David T. Rubin, Bruce E. Sands

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUlcerative colitisMaintenance therapySurgeryRescue therapyInternal medicineDermatologyGastroenterologyChemotherapyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The phase 3 QUASAR maintenance study (NCT04033445) evaluated the efficacy and safety of guselkumab (GUS), a dual-acting IL-23p19 subunit inhibitor that potently neutralizes IL-23, in patients (pts) who achieved clinical response to 12 weeks of intravenous (IV) GUS. Here we present results for effects of GUS maintenance on histologic and combined histologic and endoscopic outcomes at Week (Wk) 44. Methods: At maintenance baseline (BL), clinical responders following 12 weeks of GUS IV induction from the QUASAR Phase 2b and 3 induction studies were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 200 mg subcutaneous (SC) every 4 weeks, GUS 100 mg SC every 8 weeks, or GUS withdrawal (PBO SC). Colonic biopsies were collected during endoscopy at maintenance BL and Wk 44 to evaluate treatment effect on histology measured using Geboes, Robarts, and Nancy Histological Index. Histologic improvement, histologic remission, the combination of histologic improvement and endoscopic improvement (histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement; HEMI), the combination of histologic remission and endoscopic improvement, and the combination of histologic remission and endoscopic remission (histo-endoscopic mucosal remission) were evaluated at Wk 44 (see Table 1 for definitions). Results: Of the 568 pts randomized (at induction BL: mean age, 40.7yrs; mean UC disease duration, 7.8yrs; mean modified Mayo score, 6.9 [63.9% with severe disease]; Mayo endoscopy subscore of 3, 66.4%), 190 were receiving GUS 200 mg every 4 weeks, 188 GUS 100 mg every 8 weeks, and 190 PBO. BL characteristics were similar across treatment groups. Histologic activity at maintenance BL was similar for the GUS 200 mg every 4 weeks, GUS 100 mg every 8 weeks, and PBO treatment groups (mean continuous Geboes total score: 6.7, 6.8, and 6.9, respectively). Improvements in histologic activity at Wk 44 were observed in pts treated with GUS 200 mg every 4 weeks and GUS 100 mg every 8 weeks, while pts assigned to PBO worsened. At Wk 44, greater proportions of pts treated with GUS 200 mg every 4 weeks and GUS 100 mg every 8 weeks achieved the assessed endpoints compared to PBO (Table 1). Across biologic/JAK inhibitor therapy history subpopulations, greater proportions of GUS-treated pts achieved the assessed endpoints compared to PBO. Conclusion: In this phase 3 maintenance study, pts with UC treated with GUS 200 mg SC every 4 weeks or GUS 100 mg SC every 8 weeks experienced clinically meaningful improvements in histologic and combined histologic and endoscopic outcomes at Wk 44 compared to PBO-treated pts. Table 1. - Summary of Histologic and Combined Histologic and Endoscopic Outcomes at Week 44 GUS Withdrawal (Placebo) GUS 100 mg SC every 8 weeks GUS 200 mg SC every 4 weeks Primary analysis population, N 190 188 190 Histologic improvement, n (%)(Neutrophil infiltration in < 5% of crypts, no crypt destruction, and no erosions, ulcerations or granulation tissue according to the Geboes grading system [ie, Geboes histologic score ≤3.1]) 58 (30.5) 122 (64.9) 122 (64.2) Adjusted treatment difference (95% CI)Nominal P-value - 33.6 (24.3, 42.9) P < 0.001 32.6 (23.3, 41.9) P < 0.001 Histologic remission, n (%)(Absence of neutrophils from the mucosa [both lamina propria and epithelium], no crypt destruction, and no erosions, ulcerations or granulation tissue according to the Geboes grading system [ie, Geboes histologic score ≤2 B.0])a 51 (26.8) 111 (59.0) 115 (60.5) Adjusted treatment difference (95% CI)Nominal P-value - 31.2 (21.9, 40.5) P < 0.001 32.6 (23.5, 41.8) P < 0.001 Histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement (HEMI), n (%)(Achieving a combination of histologic improvement and endoscopic improvement [Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0 or 1 with no friability]) 32 (16.8) 82 (43.6) 91 (47.9) Adjusted treatment difference (95% CI)Multiplicity-controlled P-value - 25.7 (17.1, 34.3) P < 0.001 29.6 (21.1, 38.0) P < 0.001 Histologic remission and endoscopic improvement, n (%)(Geboes histologic score ≤2 B.0 and endoscopic improvement) 30 (15.8) 78 (41.5) 89 (46.8) Adjusted treatment difference (95% CI)Nominal P-value - 24.7 (16.2, 33.2) P < 0.001 29.6 (21.3, 38.0) P < 0.001 Histo-endoscopic mucosal remission, n (%)(Geboes histologic score ≤2 B.0 and Mayo endoscopy subscore of 0) 27 (14.2) 59 (31.4) 62 (32.6) Adjusted treatment difference (95% CI)Nominal P-value - 16.2 (8.2, 24.3) P < 0.001 16.9 (9.2, 24.7) P < 0.001 a Results for histologic remission by alternative definitions using Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI ≤ 3, with subscores of 0 for lamina propria neutrophils and neutrophils in the epithelium and without ulcers or erosion) and Nancy Histological Index (NHI ≤ 1) were identical.Note: Patients who had a prohibited change in UC medication, an ostomy or colectomy, a dose adjustment (including sham dose adjustment), discontinued study agent due to lack of therapeutic effect or due to an AE of worsening of UC, or due to other reasons except for COVID-19 related reasons (excluding COVID-19 infection) or regional crisis in Russia and Ukraine prior to Week 44 were considered not to have achieved the endpoint. Patients who had an unevaluable biopsy (ie, a biopsy that was collected, but could not be assessed due to sample preparation or technical errors) or were missing the endoscopy subscore (if applicable) or any of the histology components pertaining to an endpoint at Week 44 were considered not to have achieved the endpoint. The adjusted treatment difference and confidence intervals were based on the Wald statistic with Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) weight. The P-values were based on the CMH chi-square test, stratified by clinical remission status at maintenance baseline (Yes/No), and induction treatment (guselkumab 400 mg IV, guselkumab 200 mg IV, placebo IV crossover to guselkumab 200 mg IV).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→