S1127 A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Vedolizumab With and Without Upadacitinib in Adults With Crohn’s Disease: Design and Rationale for the VICTRIVA Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Remission rates in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) suggest a therapeutic ceiling when treated with a single advanced targeted treatment (ATT) or ATT plus immunomodulator, representing an unmet need for alternative strategies. Dual targeted therapy (DTT)/advanced combination therapy has potential to provide an additive or synergistic benefit by targeting >1 pathway. Vedolizumab (VDZ) and upadacitinib (UPA) are treatments for moderate to severe CD with different mechanisms of action, and in silico models suggest their combination could modulate a high number of pathways relevant to the pathophysiology of CD. The VICTRIVA trial aims to compare the efficacy and safety of induction with VDZ + UPA vs VDZ alone. Methods: The primary objective of VICTRIVA (NCT06227910), a randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase 3b trial in biologic experienced and biologic naïve adult patients with CD, is to assess whether induction with VDZ + UPA improves rates of clinical remission and endoscopic response at week(W) 12 vs VDZ alone. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to 12 week induction with VDZ + UPA (Group 1) or VDZ + placebo (Group 2) (Figure 1). W12 responders will enter the maintenance arm from W13-52 (VDZ monotherapy every 8 weeks [every 8 weeks] to W52; possible every 4 weeks escalation if needed). W12 nonresponders will enter prolonged induction Substudy 1 (VDZ + UPA to W24, followed by VDZ monotherapy). Patients who lose response during maintenance will be escalated to every 4 weeks, or enter rescue treatment Substudy 2 (DTT for 12 weeks, then VDZ every 4 weeks). Assessments include Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (CDAI) and patient reported outcomes at W2,6,12 during induction and in the maintenance and substudies through W52, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease (SES-CD) at screening, W12 and 52, and safety at each visit. Results: 396 patients (198 in Groups 1 and 2) will be enrolled globally. Co-primary endpoints will be CDAI clinical remission (score < 150) and SES-CD endoscopic response ( >50% score reduction) at W12. Key secondary endpoints include PRO2 clinical remission at W12, and CDAI clinical remission, SES-CD endoscopic response and PRO2 clinical remission at W52. Safety endpoints will include adverse events and adverse events of special interest. Conclusion: The VICTRIVA trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VDZ in combination with UPA relative to VDZ monotherapy in an attempt to break the current therapeutic ceiling for inducing remission in CD and improve long-term outcomes.Figure 1.: A) VDZ IV 300 mg at Weeks 0, 2, 6, and 10. B) UPA oral 45 mg once daily. C) VDZ IV 300 mg every 8 weeks, possible escalation to every 4 weeks. D) VDZ IV 300 mg every 4 weeks. eUPA oral 30 mg once daily for patients initially assigned to Group 1, 45 mg once daily for patients initially assigned to Group 2. CDAI, Crohn’s Disease Activity Index; PRO2, Patient Reported Outcome; SES-CD, Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn’s Disease; UPA, upadacitinib; VDZ, vedolizumab; IV, intravenous; every 4 weeks, every 4 weeks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".