MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403731800 · doi:10.3899/jrheum.2024-0938

Enhancing Equity in Clinical Research: A Multifaceted Proposal for Spondyloarthritis

2024· article· en· W4403731800 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Maureen Dubreuil, Elizabeth D. Ferucci, Hani El‐Gabalawy, Sarfaraz Hasni, Edith M. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Rheumatology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin DiseasesRheumatology Research FoundationNational Institute of Nursing ResearchCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthSpondylitis Association of America
KeywordsHealth equityMedicineEquity (law)Underrepresented MinorityCommunity-based participatory researchCommunity engagementPublic relationsOutcomes researchIndigenousBest practiceMedical educationAlternative medicineParticipatory action researchNursingPolitical scienceSociologyPublic health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clinical research advances medical knowledge and improves healthcare outcomes. However, disparities in research participation hinder progress. The Unmet Research Needs in Spondyloarthritis Conference IV highlighted critical insights and strategies to enhance equity in clinical research. Talks focused on engaging underrepresented communities and addressing disparities in rheumatic diseases, particularly spondyloarthritis (SpA), to ensure research results are generalizable and inclusive. Disparities in SpA management, such as greater back pain severity among Black and Hispanic Americans and sex-based differences in pain management, emphasize the need for equitable research. Dr. Elizabeth Ferucci discussed the racial disparities in rheumatologic care, highlighting the importance of early access to rheumatologists and culturally informed primary care to improve outcomes. Dr. Hani El-Gabalawy's talk on engaging Indigenous communities stressed the importance of community consent and reciprocal benefits. Dr. Sarfaraz Hasni's presentation on mitigating disparities in research participation underscored the need for inclusive practices and strategies to promote diverse representation. Finally, Dr. Edith Williams emphasized institutional approaches to fostering equity, including diverse recruitment practices and institutional review board alignment with diversity priorities. Strategies to enhance equity in clinical research include community engagement, addressing logistical barriers to participation, and ensuring diverse research teams. These approaches can dismantle barriers for underrepresented communities, making research more accessible and reflective of the broader population. The SpA research community must commit to creating structures that foster inclusivity, ensuring medical advancements benefit all populations, especially historically underrepresented groups. The principles and strategies proposed serve as a roadmap for achieving equity in SpA research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.166
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.145
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.834
Threshold uncertainty score0.877

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1660.145
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.006
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0170.057
Scholarly communication0.0300.043
Open science0.0060.035
Research integrity0.0490.067
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.515
Teacher spread0.386 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Rheumatology→Same topicInnovations in Medical Education→French-language works237,207→