Distance to <scp>CAR</scp>‐T Treatment Center Does Not Impede Delivery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma, but real-world evidence is needed to confirm safety and efficacy when facing the unique challenges of a wide geographical catchment area. METHODS: We reviewed patients treated with commercially available CAR-T at a medium-sized single center in Canada (The Ottawa Hospital) between December 2020 and July 2022 (Canadian implementation started in 2020). RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (59% male, median age 62) traveled a median distance of 655 km (range 3-3659) for treatment. Median time from apheresis to CAR-T infusion was 36 days (range 26-81). With a median follow-up of 383 days (95% CI: 333-480), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 257 days (95% CI: 92-NE) and 422 days (95% CI: 106-NE), respectively. The median PFS for out-of-province patients was 115 days (95% CI: 91-NE) versus 280 days for in-province patients (95% CI: 142-NE), p = 0.12. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that distance from treatment center (p = 0.05) and refractory disease status (p = 0.003) were independently associated with shorter PFS. The time from the last disease progression to CAR-T referral was longer for out-of-province patients, but there was no difference in the time of referral to CAR-T consult, apheresis, or CAR-T infusion between in-province and out-of-province patients. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that despite the complexity of CAR-T therapy administration, Ottawa can effectively provide commercial CAR-T therapy in a timely fashion for patients from across the country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".