MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403738369 · doi:10.1021/jacs.4c12272

Pinwheel-like Curved Aromatics from the Cyclotrimerization of Strained Alkyne Cycloparaphenylenes

2024· article· en· W4403738369 on OpenAlexaff
Tara D. Clayton, Julia M. Fehr, Tavis W. Price, Ramesh Jasti

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
Canadian institutionsImpact
FundersDivision of Chemistry
KeywordsChemistryAlkynePhotochemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon nanomaterials composed of curved aromatics, such as carbon nanotubes, are difficult to selectively synthesize and modify precisely. Smaller molecular fragments of curved nanomaterials, such as cycloparaphenylenes, benefit from the precision of bottom-up synthesis, however, efforts to expand the curved molecular framework into even larger structures often rely on restrictive early stage synthetic strategies or difficult to control polymerizations. In this work we report a high yielding, strain-promoted, late-stage modification of a series of [ n + 1]CPPs. We show that the conversion of these [ n + 1]CPPs into soluble, pinwheel-like multipore carbon nanostructures is achievable via a straightforward and efficient metal-mediated alkyne cyclotrimerization reaction. We provide insight into suitable metals for this transformation, the photophysics of these trimeric molecules, as well as their strain profiles and crystal packing. We also demonstrate the strain-enhanced nature of the reaction under the optimized conditions, showing that strained internal-alkyne [ n + 1]CPPs efficiently undergo complete conversion whereas unstrained diphenylacetylene remains completely unreacted. We anticipate that this work will have broader impacts on the study of reactivity in strained-alkyne-containing hydrocarbons, and that access to this new molecular architecture will inspire new research and applications in materials science and related fields.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.371

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Chemical SocietySame topicSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic CompoundsFrench-language works237,207