Captivity conditions matter for the gut microbiota of an endangered obligate hibernator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Conservation breeding programmes include translocations of animals across breeding facilities, both in and ex situ, and to/from their natural habitat. Newly reintroduced Vancouver Island marmots (VIMs) originating from the captive breeding programme are known to experience high winter mortality once reintroduced. Whilst high winter mortality rates amongst reintroduced VIM populations remain a concern of unknown causes, this health issue could potentially be linked to changes in gut microbiota prior to hibernation. Furthermore, captivity is known to impact the gut microbiota of mammals that could be crucial for hibernation. In this study, we explored the diversity of bacterial communities in the gut of captive marmots during the entire active season, both kept in captivity at in situ and ex situ facilities, as well as free-ranging marmots during the summer period. Gut microbial diversity was higher in marmots held in ex situ facilities, outside of their habitat range, compared to captive marmots held within their habitat range, and in the wild, and differences in composition were also observed. In the entire active season, animals kept in the ex situ facility had increased abundance in taxa known to be mucin degraders, sulphate producers and possible cross-feeders, whilst an increase in fibre degraders of in situ and free-ranging marmots is potentially linked to diet variation between facilities. These results confirm the interest to transfer animals held at zoos to an in situ facility before relocation and expand our understanding of microbiota variation according to hibernation cycles in the context of conservation biology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".