MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403748758 · doi:10.3390/plants13212981

Utilizing Short Interspersed Nuclear Element as a Genetic Marker for Pre-Harvest Sprouting in Wheat

2024· article· en· W4403748758 on OpenAlexafffund
Purnima Kandpal, Karminderbir Kaur, Raman Dhariwal, Simranjeet Kaur, Harpinder Randhawa, Jaswinder Singh

Bibliographic record

VenuePlants · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaMcGill University
FundersSaskatchewan Wheat Development CommissionAlberta Wheat CommissionAgriculture Funding ConsortiumWestern Grains Research Foundation
KeywordsSproutingBiologyAgronomyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) is a complex abiotic stress caused by multiple exogenous and endogenous variables that results in random but significant quality and yield loss at the terminal crop stage in more than half of the wheat-producing areas of the world. Systematic research over more than five decades suggests that addressing this challenge requires tools beyond the traditional genetic manipulation approach. Previous molecular studies indicate a possible role of epigenetics in the regulation of seed dormancy and PHS in crops, especially through RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathways mediated by Argonaute (AGO) proteins. In this study, we explore the role of the AGO802B gene associated with PHS resistance in wheat, through the presence of a SINE retrotransposon insertion. The current study found the SINE insertion at 3′UTR of the TaAGO802B present in 73.2% of 41 cultivars analyzed and in 92.6% of the resistant cultivar subset. The average expression of TaAGO802B in cultivars with the SINE insertion was 73.3% lower than in cultivars without insertion. This study also indicated a significant positive correlation between the PHS score and methylation levels in the cultivars. The resistant cultivars with the SINE insertion recorded 54.7% lower methylation levels than susceptible cultivars. Further analysis of a DH population (Sadash × P2711) reveals that SINE insertion co-segregates with PHS resistance. This sets forth the SINE insertion in TaAGO802B as a genetic marker for screening wheat germplasm and as an efficient tool for breeding PHS-resistant wheat cultivars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlantsSame topicPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesFrench-language works237,207