How Gut Microbiome Perturbation Caused by Antibiotic Pre-Treatments Affected the Conjugative Transfer of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The global spread of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) poses a significant threat to public health. While antibiotics effectively treat bacterial infections, they can also induce gut dysbiosis, the severity of which varies depending on the specific antibiotic treatment used. However, it remains unclear how gut dysbiosis affects the mobility and dynamics of ARGs. To address this, mice were pre-treated with streptomycin, ampicillin, or sulfamethazine, and then orally inoculated with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and S. Heidelberg carrying a multi-drug resistance IncA/C plasmid. The streptomycin pre-treatment caused severe microbiome perturbation, promoting the high-density colonization of S. Heidelberg and S. Typhimurium, and enabling an IncA/C transfer from S. Heidelberg to S. Typhimurium and a commensal Escherichia coli. The ampicillin pre-treatment induced moderate microbiome perturbation, supporting only S. Heidelberg colonization and the IncA/C transfer to commensal E. coli. The sulfamethazine pre-treatment led to mild microbiome perturbation, favoring neither Salmonella spp. colonization nor a conjugative plasmid transfer. The degree of gut dysbiosis also influenced the enrichment or depletion of the ARGs associated with mobile plasmids or core commensal bacteria, respectively. These findings underscore the significance of pre-existing gut dysbiosis induced by various antibiotic treatments on ARG dissemination and may inform prudent antibiotic use practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".