Structural-informed functional MRI analysis of patients with empathy impairment following stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The underlying functional alterations of brain structural changes among patients with empathy impairment following stroke remain unclear. We sought to investigate functional connectivity changes informed by brain structural abnormalities in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) among patients with empathy impairment following stroke. METHODS: We enrolled people who had experienced their first ischemic stroke, along with healthy controls. We assessed empathy 3 months after stroke using the Chinese version of the Empathy Quotient (EQ). During the acute phase, all patients underwent basic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), followed by multimodal MRI during follow-up. Our MRI analyses encompassed acute infarction segmentation, volumetric brain measurements, regional quantification of diffusion parameters, and both region-of-interest-based and seed-based functional connectivity assessments. We grouped patients based on the severity of their empathy impairment for comparative analysis. RESULTS: We included 84 patients who had stroke and 22 healthy controls. Patients had lower EQ scores than controls. Patients with low empathy had larger left cortical infarcts (odds ratio [OR] 4.082, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.183-14.088), more pronounced atrophy in the right cingulate cortex (OR 1.248, 95% CI 1.038-1.502), and lower scores on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (OR 0.873, 95% CI 0.74-0.947). In addition, the cingulate cortex served as the seed in the seed-based analysis, which showed heightened functional connectivity between the anterior cingulate gyrus and the right superior parietal lobule, specifically in the low-empathy group. LIMITATIONS: We did not evaluate the relationship between specific network involvement and empathy impairment among patients following stroke. CONCLUSION: Among patients with subacute ischemic stroke, reduced empathy was strongly associated with a more severe cognitive profile and atrophy of the right cingulate cortex. Our subsequent structural-informed functional MRI analysis suggests that the enhanced connectivity between the anterior cingulate gyrus and the superior parietal lobule may function as a compensatory mechanism for this atrophy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".