Multi-Scale and Multi-Network Deep Feature Fusion for Discriminative Scene Classification of High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The advancement in satellite image sensors has enabled the acquisition of high-resolution remote sensing (HRRS) images. However, interpreting these images accurately and obtaining the computational power needed to do so is challenging due to the complexity involved. This manuscript proposed a multi-stream convolutional neural network (CNN) fusion framework that involves multi-scale and multi-CNN integration for HRRS image recognition. The pre-trained CNNs were used to learn and extract semantic features from multi-scale HRRS images. Feature extraction using pre-trained CNNs is more efficient than training a CNN from scratch or fine-tuning a CNN. Discriminative canonical correlation analysis (DCCA) was used to fuse deep features extracted across CNNs and image scales. DCCA reduced the dimension of the features extracted from CNNs while providing a discriminative representation by maximizing the within-class correlation and minimizing the between-class correlation. The proposed model has been evaluated on NWPU-RESISC45 and UC Merced datasets. The accuracy associated with DCCA was 10% and 6% higher than discriminant correlation analysis (DCA) in the NWPU-RESISC45 and UC Merced datasets. The advantage of DCCA was better demonstrated in the NWPU-RESISC45 dataset due to the incorporation of richer within-class variability in this dataset. While both DCA and DCCA minimize between-class correlation, only DCCA maximizes the within-class correlation and, therefore, attains better accuracy. The proposed framework achieved higher accuracy than all state-of-the-art frameworks involving unsupervised learning and pre-trained CNNs and 2–3% higher than the majority of fine-tuned CNNs. The proposed framework offers computational time advantages, requiring only 13 s for training in NWPU-RESISC45, compared to a day for fine-tuning the existing CNNs. Thus, the proposed framework achieves a favourable balance between efficiency and accuracy in HRRS image recognition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".