MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403775011 · doi:10.3390/rs16213961

Multi-Scale and Multi-Network Deep Feature Fusion for Discriminative Scene Classification of High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images

2024· article· en· W4403775011 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersCity University of Hong Kong
KeywordsDiscriminative modelRemote sensingArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceHigh resolutionPattern recognition (psychology)Scale (ratio)Feature (linguistics)Image fusionFusionComputer visionGeologyCartographyImage (mathematics)Geography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advancement in satellite image sensors has enabled the acquisition of high-resolution remote sensing (HRRS) images. However, interpreting these images accurately and obtaining the computational power needed to do so is challenging due to the complexity involved. This manuscript proposed a multi-stream convolutional neural network (CNN) fusion framework that involves multi-scale and multi-CNN integration for HRRS image recognition. The pre-trained CNNs were used to learn and extract semantic features from multi-scale HRRS images. Feature extraction using pre-trained CNNs is more efficient than training a CNN from scratch or fine-tuning a CNN. Discriminative canonical correlation analysis (DCCA) was used to fuse deep features extracted across CNNs and image scales. DCCA reduced the dimension of the features extracted from CNNs while providing a discriminative representation by maximizing the within-class correlation and minimizing the between-class correlation. The proposed model has been evaluated on NWPU-RESISC45 and UC Merced datasets. The accuracy associated with DCCA was 10% and 6% higher than discriminant correlation analysis (DCA) in the NWPU-RESISC45 and UC Merced datasets. The advantage of DCCA was better demonstrated in the NWPU-RESISC45 dataset due to the incorporation of richer within-class variability in this dataset. While both DCA and DCCA minimize between-class correlation, only DCCA maximizes the within-class correlation and, therefore, attains better accuracy. The proposed framework achieved higher accuracy than all state-of-the-art frameworks involving unsupervised learning and pre-trained CNNs and 2–3% higher than the majority of fine-tuned CNNs. The proposed framework offers computational time advantages, requiring only 13 s for training in NWPU-RESISC45, compared to a day for fine-tuning the existing CNNs. Thus, the proposed framework achieves a favourable balance between efficiency and accuracy in HRRS image recognition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it