MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403778836 · doi:10.5376/ijh.2024.14.0033

A Comprehensive Analysis of Genomic Advances and CRISPR/Cas9 Applications in Kiwifruit (<i>Actinidia chinensis</i> Planch.)

2024· article· en· W4403778836 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Horticulture · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Physiology and Cultivation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActinidia chinensisActinidiaBiologyCRISPRBotanyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kiwifruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch.) is an important fruit crop, widely appreciated for its rich nutritional content and unique flavor.In recent years, significant advances have been made in kiwifruit genomics, providing valuable resources for biological discoveries and crop improvement.This study comprehensively analyzes the latest developments in kiwifruit genomics, with a particular focus on the application of CRISPR/Cas9 technology in this species.By synthesizing recent research findings, the study explores how genomics and gene-editing technologies can be utilized to accelerate the development of superior kiwifruit varieties.The research reveals that the kiwifruit genome has undergone multiple whole-genome duplication events, which have contributed to the diversification and specialization of genes involved in key metabolic pathways.CRISPR/Cas9 technology has been successfully applied to target specific genes, enhancing disease resistance, flavor, and nutritional content in kiwifruit.Through the use of CRISPR/Cas9, researchers are able to precisely manipulate key genes in kiwifruit, achieving objectives such as rapid flowering, enhanced disease resistance, and improved fruit quality.This provides a powerful tool for the genetic improvement of kiwifruit and guides future breeding projects.The study results offer scientific and practical guidance for promoting the sustainable development of the kiwifruit industry and enhancing its global competitiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of HorticultureSame topicPlant Physiology and Cultivation StudiesFrench-language works237,207