Harnessing Genetic Diversity in Peanut for Enhanced Crop Performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peanuts are a critical global crop, providing essential nutrients and serving as a key agricultural commodity. However, peanut cultivation faces numerous challenges, including susceptibility to drought, pests, diseases, and declining genetic diversity. To address these issues, genetic improvement of peanuts is vital. This study reviews the current status of genetic diversity in peanuts, emphasizing the importance of wild relatives, landraces, and advanced breeding lines as sources of valuable genetic variation. We also explore peanut germplasm collections, phenotypic and molecular characterization methods, and pre-breeding strategies to harness genetic resources. Additionally, we highlight breeding efforts for key traits, including yield, drought tolerance, disease resistance, and nutritional quality. The utilization of modern breeding tools, such as marker-assisted selection, genomic selection, and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing, is discussed in the context of accelerating genetic gains. A case study on breeding for aflatoxin resistance in peanuts demonstrates successful genetic interventions and future prospects. The integration of genomics, transcriptomics, and high-throughput technologies is critical for further advancing peanut breeding. Ultimately, developing climate-resilient and sustainably cultivated peanut varieties requires enhanced genetic diversity, strong policy support, and the involvement of key stakeholders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".