MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403781417 · doi:10.1093/jas/skae317

Environmental benefits of crude protein reduction in growing pig diets: is it worth going further?

2024· article· en· W4403781417 on OpenAlexaff
Léa Cappelaere, Florence Garcia-Launay, Dalila Larios, Aude Simongiovanni, Stéphane Godbout, Marie-Pierre Létourneau-Montminy

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Canadian institutionsInstitut de Recherche et de Développement en AgroenvironnementUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFood scienceBiologyBusinessAnimal scienceBiotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nitrogen (N) excretion and emissions can be reduced in fattening pigs by reducing dietary crude protein (CP) levels. Effects of this strategy are well documented for moderate CP reduction, but little literature exists on further CP reduction made possible by free isoleucine, histidine, and leucine. This trial evaluated the effects of 2 levels of reduction in CP on growth performance, N balance, and gaseous emissions. Forty-eight pigs were allocated to 12 gaseous emission-measuring chambers at 28 kg live weight. Three dietary treatments (CTRL; -1.2pt; -2.4pt), with a CP content, respectively, of 18.1%, 16.9%, and 15.0% in phase 1 (28 to 48 kg) and 16.1%, 15.0%, and 13.8% in phase 2 (48 to 80 kg), were fed ad libitum. Growth performance was recorded for each phase. Body lipid and protein composition were analyzed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in 2 animals per chamber at the beginning and end of the trial. These results were used to calculate the N balance. Slurry volume and composition were measured at the end of the trial. Ammonia, methane, and nitrous oxide emissions were recorded continuously. Data were analyzed with a general linear model including the linear and quadratic effect of CP reduction and phase as fixed effects. A trend for a quadratic effect of CP reduction on feed intake was observed (P = 0.085) with a decrease from CTRL to -1.2pt and then an increase with the -2.4pt treatment. Daily gain and gain to feed were improved by the low CP diets in phase 1 but were degraded in phase 2 (phase × CP interaction, P < 0.001) while body composition was not affected. Nitrogen excretion decreased with CP reduction (linear effect, P = 0.023) but tended to plateau with the low CP diets (quadratic effect, P = 0.081). Methane emissions per kg of gain were reduced with CP reduction (linear effect, P = 0.031). Ammonia emissions decreased with CP reduction, mostly in phase 1 (phase × CP interaction, P = 0.015); however, the emission factor (g N-NH3 / g urinary N) was not affected. Nitrous oxide emissions were not affected by CP reduction and its emission factor (g N-N2O / g N) tended to increase (linear effect, P = 0.07). Slurry ammonia-N decreased (linear effect, P < 0.023; quadratic effect, P = 0.049), but other slurry components were not significantly impacted. In this trial, a plateau in N excretion and emission reduction was reached with the -2.4pt treatment. Nevertheless, it is important to study such a reduction in conditions closer to commercial ones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAgriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactFrench-language works237,207