MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403782001 · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.10.047

Optimizing lipid nanoparticles for fetal gene delivery in vitro, ex vivo, and aided with machine learning

2024· article· en· W4403782001 on OpenAlexaff
Amr Abostait, Mahmoud Abdelkarim, Zeqing Bao, Yuichiro Miyake, Wai Hei Tse, Caterina Di Ciano-Oliveir, Tina Buerki‐Thurnherr, Christine Allen, Richard Keijzer, Hagar I. Labouta

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Controlled Release · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsOccupational Cancer Research CentreChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaUniversity of TorontoHealth Sciences Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransplacentalFetusTransfectionPlacentaIn vitroEx vivoChemistryCell biologyBiologyBiophysicsCell culturePregnancyBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a clinical need to develop lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) to deliver congenital therapies to the fetus during pregnancy. The aim of these therapies is to restore normal fetal development and prevent irreversible conditions after birth. As a first step, LNPs need to be optimized for transplacental transport, safety on the placental barrier and fetal organs and transfection efficiency. We developed and characterized a library of LNPs of varying compositions and used machine learning (ML) models to delineate the determinants of LNP size and zeta potential. Utilizing different in vitro placental models with the help of a Random Forest algorithm, we could identify the top features driving percentage LNP transport and kinetics at 24 h, out of a total of 18 input features represented by 41 LNP formulations and 48 different transport experiments. We further evaluated the LNPs for safety, placental cell uptake, transfection efficiency in placental trophoblasts and fetal lung fibroblasts. To ensure the integrity of the LNPs following transplacental transport, we screened LNPs for transport and transfection using a high-throughput integrated transport-transfection in vitro model. Finally, we assessed toxicity of the LNPs in a tracheal occlusion fetal lung explant model. LNPs showed little to no toxicity to fetal and placental cells. Immunoglobin G (IgG) orientation on the surface of LNPs, PEGylated lipids, and ionizable lipids had significant effects on placental transport. The Random Forest algorithm identified the top features driving LNPs placental transport percentage and kinetics. Zeta potential emerged in the top driving features. Building on the ML model results, we developed new LNP formulations to further optimize the transport leading to 622 % increase in transport at 24 h versus control LNP formulation. To induce preferential siRNA transfection of fetal lung, we further optimized cationic lipid percentage and the lipid-to-siRNA ratio. Studying LNPs in an integrated placental and fetal lung fibroblasts model showed a strong correlation between zeta potential and fetal lung transfection. Finally, we assessed the toxicity of LNPs in a tracheal occlusion lung explant model. The optimized formulations appeared to be safe on ex vivo fetal lungs as indicated by insignificant changes in apoptosis (Caspase-3) and proliferation (Ki67) markers. In conclusion, we have optimized an LNP formulation that is safe, with high transplacental transport and preferential transfection in fetal lung cells. Our research findings represent an important step toward establishing the safety and effectiveness of LNPs for gene delivery to the fetal organs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Controlled ReleaseSame topicRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryFrench-language works237,207