MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403789061 · doi:10.1093/jnci/djae269

Adjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX for resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma: clinical insights and genomic features from a large contemporary cohort

2024· article· en· W4403789061 on OpenAlexaff
Fergus Keane, Catherine O’Connor, Drew Moss, Joanne F. Chou, Maria Perry, Fionnuala Crowley, Parima Saxena, Amelia Chan, Joshua D. Schoenfeld, Anupriya Singhal, Wungki Park, Darren Cowzer, Emily Harrold, Anna M. Varghese, Imane El Dika, Christopher H. Crane, James J. Harding, Ghassan K. Abou‐Alfa, T. Peter Kingham, Alice C. Wei, Kenneth H. Yu, Michael I. D’Angelica, Vinod P. Balachandran, Jeffrey A. Drebin, William R. Jarnagin, Chaitanya Bandlamudi, David P. Kelsen, Marinela Capanu, Kevin C. Soares, Fiyinfolu Balogun, Eileen M. O’Reilly

Bibliographic record

VenueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthAstraZeneca
KeywordsFOLFIRINOXAdjuvantMedicineCohortAdenocarcinomaOncologyInternal medicinePancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaPancreatic cancerCancerOxaliplatin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant modified leucovorin calcium, fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) is standard of care for fit individuals with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Data are limited on adjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX outcomes outside clinical trials. METHODS: We queried institutional databases to identify patients with resected PDAC who received 1 or more doses of adjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX. Primary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival. Secondary endpoints were clinical factors and genomic features associated with outcomes. We estimated RFS and overall survival by using the Kaplan-Meier method. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to associate clinicogenomic features with survival outcomes. RESULTS: A search revealed 147 individuals with PDAC between January 2015 and January 2023. Median patient age was 67 years, with 57 (39%) patients older than 70 years. Unfavorable prognostic features included 52 (36%) patients with N2 nodal status, 115 (78%) patients with lymphovascular invasion, and 133 (90%) patients with perineural invasion. Median time from surgery to initiation of modified FOLFIRINOX was 1.78 months (IQR = 1.45-2.12). In total, 124 (84%) patients completed 12 doses; 98 (67%) patients stopped oxaliplatin early because of neuropathy (median = 10 doses, range = 4-12 doses). Further dosing characteristics are summarized in Table S3, with a median follow-up of 35.1 months, a median RFS of 26 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 19 to 39), and a median overall survival not reached. For the cohort older than 70 years of age, the median RFS was 23 months (95% CI = 14 to not reached) and the median overall survival was 51 months (95% CI = 37 to not reached). Modified FOLFIRINOX started sooner than 8 weeks from resection was associated with improved RFS (hazard ratio = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.41 to 0.96; P = .033) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.3 to 0.94; P = .030). KRAS variation and whole-genome doubling trended to shorter RFS and overall survival. Homologous recombination deficiency status did not confer improved survival outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant modified FOLFIRINOX was effective and tolerated in patients with resected PDAC in a nontrial setting, including for patients older than 70 years of age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJNCI Journal of the National Cancer InstituteSame topicPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchFrench-language works237,207