MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403799026 · doi:10.1681/asn.0000000541

Long-Term Results from an Open-Label Extension Study of Atacicept for the Treatment of IgA Nephropathy

2024· article· en· W4403799026 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Barratt, Sean J. Barbour, Robert Brenner, Kerry Cooper, Xuelian Wei, Necmi Eren, Jürgen Floege, Vivekanand Jha, Sung Gyun Kim, Bart Maes, Richard Phoon, Harmeet Singh, Vladimı́r Tesař, Richard Lafayette

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsNovelis (Canada)University of British Columbia
FundersAmerican Society of Nephrology
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineNephropathyPlaceboGastroenterologyImmunologyEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Points Participants who completed a 36-week double-blind study of atacicept were eligible for a 60-week, open-label extension study. Atacicept 96-week treatment resulted in sustained reductions in galactose-deficient IgA1, hematuria, and urine protein-creatinine ratio. The slope of the eGFR was similar to that observed in the general population without kidney disease. Background B-cell activating factor (BAFF) and A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) play key roles in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. Atacicept is a novel fully humanized fusion protein, self-administered at home by subcutaneous injection, that binds and inhibits BAFF and APRIL. By inhibiting BAFF and APRIL, atacicept targets the underlying B-cell–mediated pathogenesis driving disease progression. This study evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of atacicept in patients with IgA nephropathy over 96 weeks. Methods Participants with IgA nephropathy who received atacicept (25, 75, or 150 mg) or placebo in a 36-week phase 2b, randomized, blinded trial were enrolled in an open-label extension study and received atacicept 150 mg for an additional 60 weeks. Key efficacy outcomes were changes in galactose-deficient IgA1 (Gd-IgA1), percentage of participants with hematuria, urine protein-creatinine ratio (UPCR), and eGFR over 96 weeks. Long-term safety data were also evaluated. Results There were 113 participants (67 [59%] male; 46 [41%] female) who ranged in age from 18 to 67 years who received ≥1 atacicept dose. Over 96 weeks, safety data demonstrated that atacicept was generally well tolerated. There were also sustained reductions (mean±SEM) in Gd-IgA1 (−66%±2%), percentage of participants with hematuria (−75%; 95% confidence intervals, −87 to −59; in participants with baseline hematuria), and UPCR (−52%±5%). The mean annualized slope of eGFR was −0.6±0.5 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 through 96 weeks. Conclusions Atacicept was well tolerated over the duration of the study. Atacicept treatment reduced Gd-IgA1, hematuria, and UPCR with stabilization of eGFR through 96 weeks. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: Atacicept in Subjects with IgA Nephropathy (ORIGIN 2), NCT04716231. Podcast This article contains a podcast at https://dts.podtrac.com/redirect.mp3/www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/JASN/2024_10_26_KTS_October2024.mp3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesFrench-language works237,207