Dynamics and prognostic role of persistent angina in chronic coronary syndrome with clinical, angiographic and stress CMR evidence of ischemia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background In patients with established chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), the significance of myocardial ischemia is a controversial issue. Persistent angina within the first year after treatment intervention has ranged widely in previous studies and its association with subsequent hard clinical events is unclear. We aim to evaluate the long-term dynamics of angina class and the prognostic role of persistent angina in symptomatic chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) patients with abnormal stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and altered angiography. Methods We analyzed 486 CCS patients with Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class ≥2, perfusion deficit in stress CMR and severe lesions in angiography submitted to treatment intervention (medical therapy plus, if feasible, CMR-guided revascularization). The dynamics and association of persistent angina at 6 months post-intervention with subsequent cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and admission for heart failure were investigated. Results All patients displayed angina class ≥2 (mean: 2.7±0.7), abnormal stress CMR (mean ischemic burden: 6.2±3 segments) and severe angiographic lesions. Most underwent CMR-guided revascularization (n=392, 81%). The angina resolution rate was 78% at 6 months, and 79%, 77%, and 75% at 1, 2, and 5 years respectively. Compared with medical treatment alone, CMR-guided revascularization was associated with less persistent angina (19% vs. 35%; HR 0.42 [0.2–0.7]; p=0.003). During an 8.3-year median follow-up, persistent angina was independently associated with higher subsequent cardiac death rates (18% vs. 4%; HR 10.9 [4.1–29.2]; p<0.001), myocardial infarction (24% vs. 6%; HR 5.8 [3.2–10.4]; p<0.001), and admission for heart failure (31% vs. 14%; HR 2.7 [1.7–4.2]; p<0.001). Conclusions In CCS patients with robust diagnostic evidence by symptoms, stress CMR and angiography, sustained improvement of anginal symptoms can be achieved in most patients after treatment intervention. Angina resolution is more frequent in patients treated with CMR-guided revascularization and is associated with fewer cardiac events.Central Figure.Persistent angina and MACE risk
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".