User Perceptions of Wearability of Knitted Sensor Garments for Long-Term Monitoring of Breathing Health: Thematic Analysis of Focus Groups and a Questionnaire Survey
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-term unobtrusive monitoring of breathing patterns can potentially give a more realistic insight into the respiratory health of people with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease than brief tests performed in medical environments. However, it is uncertain whether users would be willing to wear these sensor garments long term. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to explore whether users would wear ordinary looking knitted garments with unobtrusive knitted-in breathing sensors long term to monitor their lung health and under what conditions. METHODS: Multiple knitted breathing sensor garments, developed and fabricated by the research team, were presented during a demonstration. Participants were encouraged to touch and feel the garments and ask questions. This was followed by two semistructured, independently led focus groups with a total of 16 adults, of whom 4 had asthma. The focus group conversations were recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis was carried out by three independent researchers in 3 phases consisting of familiarization with the data, independent coding, and overarching theme definition. Participants also completed a web-based questionnaire to probe opinion about wearability and functionality of the garments. Quantitative analysis of the sensors' performance was mapped to participants' garment preference to support the feasibility of the technology for long-term wear. RESULTS: Key points extracted from the qualitative data were (1) garments are more likely to be worn if medically prescribed, (2) a cotton vest worn as underwear was preferred, and (3) a breathing crisis warning system was seen as a promising application. The qualitative analysis showed a preference for a loose-fitting garment style with short sleeves (13/16 participants), 11 out of 16 would also wear snug fitting garments and none of the participants would wear tight-fitting garments over a long period of time. In total, 10 out of 16 participants would wear the snug fitting knitted garment for the whole day and 13 out of 16 would be happy to wear it only during the night if not too hot. The sensitivity demands on the knitted wearable sensors can be aligned with most users' garment preferences (snug fit). CONCLUSIONS: There is an overall positive opinion about wearing a knitted sensor garment over a long period of time for monitoring respiratory health. The knit cannot be tight but a snugly fitted vest as underwear in a breathable material is acceptable for most participants. These requirements can be fulfilled with the proposed garments. Participants with asthma supported using it as a sensor garment connected to an asthma attack alert system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it