MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Frailty, cognition and patient-reported outcomes in middle-aged and older adults with congenital heart disease: insights from an international multicentric study

2024· article· en· W4403806947 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bo Daelman, Liesbet Van Bulck, Eva Goossens, Koen Luyckx, Adrienne H. Kovacs, Philip Moons

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersVlaamse regeringFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
KeywordsMedicineCognitionDiseaseHeart diseasePediatricsGerontologyPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Prior research has demonstrated that a significant proportion of older patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) are frail or pre-frail and experience cognitive impairment. However, it remains unclear whether frailty and cognition are related to patient-reported outcomes (PROs) such as perceived health, anxiety and depression symptoms or quality of life in CHD. Purpose The objective of this study was to explore the relationships between frailty, cognitive function, and PROs in middle-aged and older adults with CHD ranging from mild to severe complexity. Methods As part of the cross-sectional ‘Assessment of Patterns of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adults with Congenital Heart disease – International Study II’ (APPROACH-IS II), we enrolled 814 individuals aged 40 years and older (median age: 52.0 years [45.0-61.0]; 51.4% female; 12.7% mild, 70.1% moderate, 17.2% complex CHD; 41.9% pre-frail, 5.8% frail; 38.7% cognitively impaired) across 17 centers in 11 countries. Frailty status was assessed using the Fried criteria, which categorize individuals into robust, pre-frail, and frail based on five factors: weakness, slow gait, unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, and low physical activity levels. Cognitive function was determined using the Montréal Cognitive Assessment. Participants completed questionnaires to evaluate perceived health (RAND-12 Health Survey, yielding both Physical and Mental Component Summaries, and EuroQOL-5D Visual Analog Scale), depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-8), anxiety symptoms (General Anxiety Disorder scale-7), and quality of life (QoL Linear Analog Scale). Results Frailty was significantly associated with all PROs, with frail and pre-frail individuals reporting less favorable outcomes (see Figure). Cognitive function was linked to perceived health and anxiety, with patients exhibiting cognitive impairments reporting poorer perceived health and more anxiety symptoms. Conclusion This study indicates that concepts of frailty, cognitive functioning and PROs are closely related in adults with CHD. Frailty and cognition thus represent important domains when developing strategies to optimize PROs in adults with CHD. Moreover, when working with patients who are frail or cognitively impaired, healthcare workers are encouraged to consider and inquire about potential impact on PROs. Longitudinal research is needed to explore the direction of the association.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCongenital Heart Disease Studies→French-language works237,207→