MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403811400 · doi:10.1681/asn.2024s6p55cw6

Updated Design and Status of CONTINUITY: A Phase 4 Study of Continued Postdischarge Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate in CKD

2024· article· en· W4403811400 on OpenAlexaff
James O. Burton, Alpesh Amin, María Jesús Izquierdo, Cecilia Linde, Nicolás Roberto Robles, Manish M. Sood, Alaster Allum, James M. Eudicone, Katie Mohan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacy and Medical Practices
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZirconiumSodiumMedicinePhase (matter)Internal medicineMaterials scienceChemistryInorganic chemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Patients (pts) hospitalized with hyperkalemia (HK) have increased risk of recurrent HK and re-hospitalization. The ongoing CONTINUITY study (NCT05347693) compares efficacy of continued post-discharge sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) treatment vs standard of care (SoC) in hospitalized pts with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and HK. We present protocol changes made to clarify eligibility criteria, better align inclusion/exclusion criteria with local practice, and ensure a more clinically relevant main secondary endpoint (Figure). Methods: CONTINUITY is a randomized, open-label study across 6 European countries. Pts with CKD admitted to hospital with HK will be treated in hospital with SZC. At discharge, pts with normokalemia (NK; serum potassium [sK+] 3.5–5.0 mmol/L) are randomized 1:1 to SZC:SoC, per local label/practice, for 180 days. The primary endpoint evaluates SZC efficacy as part of discharge medications, vs SoC, in maintaining NK. The main secondary endpoint evaluates the effect of SZC as part of discharge medications, vs SoC, in reducing incidence of the composite outcome of all-cause hospital admissions, or emergency department visits with HK as a contributing factor, or all-cause death, or use of rescue-therapy for HK. Results: As of May 2024, 179 pts were enrolled and 129 randomized (SZC n=65; SoC n=64) from Belgium (n=2), France (n=6), Italy (n=9), the Netherlands (n=1), Spain (n=109), and the UK (n=2); mean age 72 years, 29% female. Further baseline demographics/characteristics will be presented at Kidney Week 2024. Conclusion: The CONTINUITY study (estimated completion: Dec 2024) will provide important evidence supporting either SoC or more active sK+ management with a K+ binder post discharge for pts with CKD admitted with HK. Protocol changes allow inclusion of a wider pt population and the potential to improve the clinical relevance of the results. Funding: Commercial Support - AstraZeneca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.365 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of NephrologySame topicPharmacy and Medical PracticesFrench-language works237,207