MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403812717 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae666.996

Relationship between NT-proBNP, echocardiographic abnormalities and functional status in patients with subclinical diabetic cardiomyopathy

2024· article· en· W4403812717 on OpenAlexaff
Pishoy Gouda, Ye Liu, Javed Butler, Stefano Del Prato, Nasrien E. Ibrahim, C. S. P. Lam, T. Marwick, J Rosenstock, W.H. Wilson Tang, Faı̈ez Zannad, James L. Januzzi, Justin A. Ezekowitz

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSubclinical infectionInternal medicineDiabetic cardiomyopathyCardiomyopathyCardiologyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Persons with diabetes are at risk for developing a cardiomyopathy through several pathophysiological mechanisms independent of traditional risk factors for heart failure. Among those with so-called diabetic cardiomyopathy (DbCM), the relationship between natriuretic peptides, cardiac structural abnormalities and functional capacity is largely unknown. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate associations between NT-proBNP concentrations, clinical characteristics, echocardiographic findings, health status and activity, and outcomes from cardiopulmonary exercise testing Methods The Aldose Reductase Inhibition for Stabilization of Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure Trial (ARISE-HF) trial is evaluating the effects of AT-001, a novel aldose-reductase inhibitor in participants with DbCM without a prior history of heart failure (1). Participants were included if they had a known diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and age ≥60 (or ≥45 with a duration of diabetes of ≥10 years or estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 mL/min/1.73m2). Participants were required to have evidence of one of: structural cardiac abnormality, elevated cardiac biomarkers, or impaired exercise tolerance, defined as a peak oxygen uptake (VO2) ≤75% of predicted. In this prespecified subgroup analysis of the ARISE-HF trial, 685 participants with baseline echocardiography data, laboratory investigations, and functional assessment were included. Participants were stratified by N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) quartiles, and correlation with echocardiographic and functional parameters were assessed using Spearman correlation test. Results The mean age of participants was 67.4 years and 50% were female. The mean duration of type 2 diabetes was 14.5 years with a mean hemoglobin A1c of 6.98. The median NT-proBNP was 71 (Q1, Q3: 33, 135) ng/L. No association was observed between NT-proBNP concentrations and echocardiographic parameters of either diastolic or systolic dysfunction including global longitudinal strain, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass index, left atrial volume index, E/e’, or right ventricular systolic pressure (Figure 1). In contrast, NT-proBNP was significantly correlated with components of the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (P<0.001), the Physical Activity Scale in the Elderly (P=0.004), duration of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (P<0.001), peak VO 2 (P<0.001), and ratio of minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (P=0.002; Figure 2). Conclusion Among highly selected patients with subclinical DbCM, elevated NT-proBNP concentrations are associated with worse health status, lower activity levels, and reduced functional capacity, but not with cardiac structural abnormalities. These findings suggest that regardless of cardiac structural abnormalities, biomarker concentrations reflect important deterioration in functional capacity in affected individuals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal→Same topicCardiovascular Function and Risk Factors→French-language works237,207→