MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403815577 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1040

Home-based nursing care for clients carrying multidrug-resistant organisms: a focus group study

2024· article· en· W4403815577 on OpenAlexaff
TJC Langeveld, Manon Haverkate, F. de Haan, Renske Eilers, Aura Timen

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsAthena Sustainable Materials Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNursingFocus groupMedicinePsychologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The growing population of vulnerable clients receiving home-based nursing care, combined with the worldwide increase in the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs), poses a new burden on nursing staff. This study aimed to gain insight into the experiences, attitudes, perceptions, dilemmas in daily practice and needs of nursing staff providing home-based nursing care for clients carrying MDROs. Methods Seven focus group discussions with home-based nursing staff (N = 34) were performed in the Netherlands between April and July 2022, using a semi-structured, open-ended topic list based on the I-change model and seven domains synthesized by Flottorp et al. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Home-based nursing staff often considered infection prevention and control recommendations inconsistent, unclear or inapplicable in daily practice. Although participants acknowledged the importance of these precaution measures, their proportionality was sometimes questioned. Participants indicated to be influenced by perceptions, knowledge and behaviour of their colleagues and clients. In addition, they frequently experienced untimely, incomplete or inconspicuous information transfers about clients carrying MDROs. Concerns were expressed that clients were often insufficiently informed, debating the roles and responsibilities of involved healthcare professionals in providing and exchanging information. Finally, participants elaborated on the effect of the covid-19 pandemic and expressed the need for organisational support in providing education and sufficient resources regarding MDROs. Conclusions Insights of this study have aided in aligning upcoming MDRO guidelines for home-based nursing care in the Netherlands. Organisational support in expanding knowledge and providing sufficient resources is essential and clarity about roles and responsibilities of involved healthcare professionals regarding information transfer and informing patients is needed. Key messages • Expanding knowledge, sufficient resources and adequate information transfer about MDRO carriage are essential to ultimately prevent transmission and spread of MDROs. • The specific context of home-based nursing care for clients carrying MDROs should be acknowledged in MDRO guidelines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public Health→Same topicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria→French-language works237,207→