MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Global deficiency in the inflammatory chemokine receptors 1,2,3 and 5 prevents vascular dysfunction in angiotensin II-induced hypertension and selectively modulates aortic myeloid cell phenotype

2024· article· en· W4403818022 on OpenAlexaff
Song Gu, Danila Gurgone, Neil MacRitchie, Maryam Shoaran, Ryszard Nosalski, Francesca Vidler, E Crespo, David Ahern, Claudia Monaco, Gerard J. Graham, Tomasz J. Guzik, Pasquale Maffia

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChemokine receptors and signaling
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersBritish Heart Foundation
KeywordsMedicineChemokine receptorPhenotypeCCR2ChemokineAngiotensin IIReceptorInflammationMyeloid cellsInternal medicineMyeloidImmunologyCardiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Leukocyte migration to the vasculature and the heart plays a critical role in hypertensive immune responses and is a carefully orchestrated process, regulated by the interactions of inflammatory chemokines with their receptors, notably CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, and CCR5 (collectively termed inflammatory chemokine receptors (iCCRs)). However, the inflammatory chemokine/receptor system is characterised by redundancy, ligand sharing and overlapping expression patterns. Consequently, our understanding of the specific and combinatory roles of chemokine receptors in cardiovascular inflammation remains incomplete, thus hindering the development of targeted therapies. To address this challenge, we have utilised two novel mouse models: iREP mice, carrying fluorescent reporters of inflammatory chemokine receptor expression, and TACKO mice, in which the entire iCcr locus containing Ccr1, Ccr2, Ccr3, and Ccr5 has been deleted. Purpose To evaluate the expression pattern of iCCRs in experimental hypertension and understand how the global deletion of iCCRs impacts disease progression. Methods We induced hypertension in mice by subcutaneously implanting osmotic minipumps administering angiotensin II (Ang II) for a duration of 14 days. Single-cell RNA sequencing was utilised for investigating iCCR expression in aortas during hypertension. Additionally, we employed flow cytometry and confocal microscopy to track iCCR expression and localization in aortas and hearts obtained from iREP mice. TACKO mice were utilised to assess the effect of global iCCr deficiency on hypertensive phenotypes. Blood pressure was measured via telemetry and vascular function was assessed using myography. Vascular and heart remodelling were evaluated through histology. Molecular mechanisms were analysed using Western Blotting and RT-qPCR, while immune cell changes in the aorta were evaluated through cytometry of time-of-flight (CyTOF). Results Ang II infusion induced higher iCCRs expression levels in both the aorta and the heart in comparison with sham treatment, particularly in fibrotic areas. After Ang II-treatment, global deletion of iCCRs in TACKO mice resulted in the prevention of endothelial dysfunction (n=5/group, P<0.05) and perivascular fibrosis (n=6-9, P<0.01), and a reduction in cardiomyocyte size (n=12-16, P<0.01) compared to wild type mice. However, no significant improvements were observed in other hypertensive phenotypes, including blood pressure, heart fibrosis, vascular NO synthase, and oxidative stress. CyTOF analysis revealed reductions in inflammatory monocytes and conventional type 2 dendritic cells in TACKO aorta, accompanied by a phenotypic switch in macrophages towards a less inflammatory phenotype. Conclusion Deficiency in iCCRs confers protective effects against vascular dysfunction in experimental hypertension, primarily by selectively reducing inflammatory myeloid cell homing to the aorta.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicChemokine receptors and signalingFrench-language works237,207