Gene-Excessive Sleepiness Interactions Suggest Treatment Targets for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Subtype
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a multifactorial sleep disorder characterized by a strong genetic basis. Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a symptom that is reported by a subset of OSA patients, persisting even after treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). It is recognized as a clinical subtype underlying OSA carrying alarming heightened cardiovascular risk. Thus, conceptualizing EDS as an exposure variable, we sought to investigate EDS’s influence on genetic variation linked to apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), a diagnostic measure of OSA severity. This study serves as the first large-scale genome-wide gene x environment interaction analysis for AHI, investigating the interplay between its genetic markers and EDS across and within specific sex. Our work pools together whole genome sequencing data from seven cohorts, enabling a diverse dataset (four population backgrounds) of over 11,500 samples. Among the total 16 discovered genetic targets with interaction evidence with EDS, eight are previously unreported for OSA, including CCDC3 , MARCHF1 , and MED31 identified in all sexes; TMEM26 , CPSF4L , and PI4K2B identified in males; and RAP1GAP and YY1 identified in females. We discuss connections to insulin resistance, thiamine deficiency, and resveratrol use that may be worthy of therapeutic consideration for excessively sleepy OSA patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".