MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Trajectories of weight and their impact on cardiac remodeling and function 16 years after bariatric surgery

2024· article· en· W4403822468 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mathieu Piché, X. Tremblay, Marie‐Claude Blais, C. Prémont, Marianne Mathieu, Audrey Auclair, M. Pettigrew, Élisa Marin‐Couture, Fannie Lajeunesse‐Trempe, Simon Marceau, P. Poirier

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, Université Laval
KeywordsMedicineCardiac surgeryVentricular remodelingCardiac function curveCardiologySurgeryInternal medicineHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Obesity is a major risk factor for heart failure, particularly heart failure with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction. Surgical treatment of obesity have significant beneficial short-term effects on weight loss and on cardiac function; its long-term impact on cardiac remodeling and function remains largely unknown. Purpose We examine the long-term effect of bariatric surgery on cardiac remodeling and function in adults with preserved LV ejection fraction. Methods Forty-four individuals with severe obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥35kg/m2] and preserved LV ejection fraction (≥50%) who underwent bariatric surgery (biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch [BPD-DS]) were included. Anthropometric measurements and echocardiography were obtained at baseline, 12 months and 16 years follow-up. Results Mean age of participants (71% female) was 44 ± 8 years and body mass index (BMI) 49.6 ± 6.1 kg/m2. Bariatric surgery led to marked weight reduction and significant improvements in obesity-related metabolic conditions/comorbidities (hypertension, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes). Mean percentage of weight loss at 12 months was 37.1 ± 7.0 %. Percentage of weight regain at 16 years averaged 8.9 ± 35.0 %. Bariatric surgery was associated with a significant reduction in indexed LV mass and LV hypertrophy (p <0.01), and improvement in LV diastolic function parameters (p <0.01) at 12 months. In many participants, cardiac remodeling parameters deteriorated at 16 years follow-up compared to the echocardiographic measurements taken at 12 months post-surgery. Prevalence of LV diastolic dysfunction increased at 16 years (81 vs. 38%; p<0.001), even after adjusting for age. Weight regain at 16 years (regaining >10% of weight lost; n=25; 57%) was not found to be associated with a worsening in cardiac remodeling compared to those who maintained weight loss, except for indexed LV mass (-9.3 ± 10.6 vs. -5.5 ± 7.8 g/m2.7; p=0.04) and LV end-diastolic diameter (-5.4 ± 4.0 vs. -3.5 ± 3.3 cm; p=0.01). Conclusion Bariatric surgery (BPD-DS) leads to durable long-term weight loss. Weight regain following bariatric surgery does not appear to have adverse effect on cardiac remodeling and function. Surgical treatment of obesity may be an effective and safe way to prevent clinical cardiac dysfunction and heart failure related to obesity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicCardiovascular Disease and AdiposityFrench-language works237,207