MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4403823408 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckae144.1994

Using diversity, equity and inclusion school practices to mitigate child health inequities in Canada

2024· article· en· W4403823408 on OpenAlexaffabout
Julia Dabravolskaj, Paul J. Veugelers, Katerina Maximova

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoUniversity of AlbertaSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth equityEquity (law)Diversity (politics)Inclusion (mineral)Economic growthDemographic economicsEnvironmental healthGeographyPolitical scienceMedicineSociologyEconomicsHealth careGender studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background The burden of unhealthy lifestyle behaviours and mental disorders disproportionately affects children in deprived neighbourhoods. In Canada, school practices addressing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) are promoted to address such inequities. We aimed to assess whether DEI school practices can help mitigate the impact of neighbourhood deprivation on children’s lifestyle behaviours and mental health. Methods In 2023 we gathered survey data from 1497 grade 4-6 children (aged 9-12) in 22 elementary schools located in deprived neighbourhoods in Alberta, Canada. Children reported their diet, screen time, physical activity, and mental health. Principals reported on the implementation of DEI practices in schools (full vs. partial). School postal codes were used to derive tertiles of the Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation, comprised of four dimensions that capture: 1) residential instability; 2) economic dependency; 3) ethno-cultural composition and 4) situational vulnerability of neighbourhoods. Results Overall, 45% of schools had fully implemented DEI practices. These schools were located in more deprived neighbourhoods for residential instability (55%), economic dependency (71%), ethno-cultural composition (60%), and situational vulnerability (64%). Children in more deprived neighbourhoods reported more sugar consumption, more screen time, and poorer mental health, compared to children in less deprived neighbourhoods. However, in those neighbourhoods where DEI practices were fully implemented, the adverse effects of neighbourhood deprivation were alleviated, whereby children reported less sugar consumption, less screen time, and better mental health. Conclusions The implementation of DEI school practices can help mitigate the adverse effects of neighbourhood deprivation on children’s physical and mental health, particularly in deprived neighbourhoods. Key messages • School practices targeting diversity, equity, and inclusion are more commonly implemented in schools located in deprived neighbourhoods. • Diversity, equity, and inclusion school practices mitigate the adverse effects of neighbourhood deprivation on children’s lifestyle behaviours and mental health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.258
GPT teacher head0.458
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Public HealthSame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207