MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4403830556 · doi:10.1681/asn.2024yjcnr6zg

Factors Associated with Major and Minor Complications of Percutaneous Kidney Biopsy: A Quality Improvement Project

2024· article· en· W4403830556 on OpenAlexaff
Lindsay Richels, Ameer Abusada, Shubrandu Sanjoy, Bonnie Richardson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Health AuthoritySaskatchewan HealthUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePercutaneousNephrologyBiopsyUrologyIntensive care medicineSurgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Percutaneous kidney biopsies are commonly performed in the evaluation of acute and chronic kidney disease. Due to physiologic, anatomic, and equipment factors, complications are not uncommon. Fortunately, most complications are minor and self-resolving. Life-threatening complications include bleeding requiring blood transfusion, need for angioembolization, and death. Recent literature suggests that these major complications are exceedingly rare. This study aimed to determine the rate of major and minor complications in both outpatient and inpatient kidney biopsies at a tertiary centre and to understand the factors associated with these complications. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who received a kidney biopsy between 2020 and 2023 was conducted. Patients who were at least 15 years of age and underwent a biopsy in the outpatient or inpatient setting were included. Primary endpoints were minor complications (pain, hematoma formation, gross hematuria) and major complications (blood transfusion, admission to hospital, embolization, death). Factors including use of anticoagulation, use of antiplatelet agents, baseline blood pressure, hemoglobin, and platelet count were obtained. Results: Data from 120 patients were analyzed with 52.5% being male. Median age was 65 years (IQR 50-74) and 70.6% of biopsies were performed in the outpatient setting. All biopsies were performed by interventional radiology staff and the median number of needle passes was 3. Anti-platelet agents were held for a median of 4 days (IQR 1-7). Major complications were observed in 4.2% of patients (n = 5), including blood transfusion (1.67%), need for angiography (1.67%) and death (0.83%). Conclusion: The rate of major complications at this tertiary centre was higher compared to recently published literature. Significant practitioner variation was observed with respect to the use of anti-platelet medications and blood pressure targets peri-biopsy. Interventions to improve patient safety could include protocols to review all anti-platelet and anti-coagulant medications prior to percutaneous kidney biopsy, practitioner order sets to manage blood pressure, and education surrounding the use of post-procedure imaging when blood products or fluid resuscitation is required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Society of Nephrology→Same topicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies→French-language works237,207→